From: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH igt 1/6] tests/kms_draw_crc: remove unnecessary mode unset calls
Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2016 13:40:19 -0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1482853219.2598.6.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161227145932.GG31952@dvetter-linux.ger.corp.intel.com>
Em Ter, 2016-12-27 às 15:59 +0100, Daniel Vetter escreveu:
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 06:42:03PM -0200, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> >
> > I couldn't think of a reason why we would need to unset the CRTCs
> > before doing the modesets on this test, so remove all the mode
> > unset
> > calls.
>
> There was (not sure whether still is) an issue with the igt_kms
> library
> that it kept the existing config, and that then lead to impossible
> configs. I think we're now clearing just the sw state correctly
> though, so
> doing it with a full commit (and all the time-wasting implied) would
> be
> overkill.
>
> Anyway, that was the reason, worth to double check this is indeed
> working
> now. You probably need multiple screens to make it go boom.
I don't use the igt_kms midlayer stuff... I do the libdrm KMS IOCTLs
directly because IMHO they're much simpler and predictable and easier
to use and with no side-effects, so that's definitely not a problem.
And now you just gave me another reason to not port the program to the
igt_kms API :).
I'm pretty sure the mode unsets were just to be extra-safe in
guaranteeing that whatever crtc/connector/mode we chose would work, but
that's not really a problem.
> -Daniel
>
> >
> >
> > Before:
> > $ time -p sudo ./kms_draw_crc
> > real 44.74
> > $ time -p for i in $(sudo ./kms_draw_crc --list-subtests); do sudo
> > ./kms_draw_crc --run-subtest $i; done
> > real 121.61
> >
> > After:
> > $ time -p sudo ./kms_draw_crc
> > real 7.40
> > $ time -p for i in $(sudo ./kms_draw_crc --list-subtests); do sudo
> > ./kms_draw_crc --run-subtest $i; done
> > real 14.32
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
> > ---
> > tests/kms_draw_crc.c | 7 -------
> > 1 file changed, 7 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tests/kms_draw_crc.c b/tests/kms_draw_crc.c
> > index cb28052..e163981 100644
> > --- a/tests/kms_draw_crc.c
> > +++ b/tests/kms_draw_crc.c
> > @@ -143,7 +143,6 @@ static void get_method_crc(enum igt_draw_method
> > method, uint32_t drm_format,
> >
> > igt_pipe_crc_collect_crc(pipe_crc, crc);
> >
> > - kmstest_unset_all_crtcs(drm_fd, drm_res);
> > igt_remove_fb(drm_fd, &fb);
> > }
> >
> > @@ -152,8 +151,6 @@ static void draw_method_subtest(enum
> > igt_draw_method method,
> > {
> > igt_crc_t crc;
> >
> > - kmstest_unset_all_crtcs(drm_fd, drm_res);
> > -
> > /* Use IGT_DRAW_MMAP_GTT on an untiled buffer as the
> > parameter for
> > * comparison. Cache the value so we don't recompute it
> > for every single
> > * subtest. */
> > @@ -184,7 +181,6 @@ static void get_fill_crc(uint64_t tiling,
> > igt_crc_t *crc)
> >
> > igt_pipe_crc_collect_crc(pipe_crc, crc);
> >
> > - kmstest_unset_all_crtcs(drm_fd, drm_res);
> > igt_remove_fb(drm_fd, &fb);
> > }
> >
> > @@ -194,8 +190,6 @@ static void fill_fb_subtest(void)
> > struct igt_fb fb;
> > igt_crc_t base_crc, crc;
> >
> > - kmstest_unset_all_crtcs(drm_fd, drm_res);
> > -
> > igt_create_fb(drm_fd, ms.mode->hdisplay, ms.mode-
> > >vdisplay,
> > DRM_FORMAT_XRGB8888,
> > LOCAL_DRM_FORMAT_MOD_NONE, &fb);
> >
> > @@ -214,7 +208,6 @@ static void fill_fb_subtest(void)
> > get_fill_crc(LOCAL_I915_FORMAT_MOD_X_TILED, &crc);
> > igt_assert_crc_equal(&crc, &base_crc);
> >
> > - kmstest_unset_all_crtcs(drm_fd, drm_res);
> > igt_remove_fb(drm_fd, &fb);
> > }
> >
> > --
> > 2.7.4
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
>
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-12-27 15:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-12-22 20:42 [PATCH igt 1/6] tests/kms_draw_crc: remove unnecessary mode unset calls Paulo Zanoni
2016-12-22 20:42 ` [PATCH igt 2/6] kms_frontbuffer_tracking: fix sink CRC assertion Paulo Zanoni
2016-12-22 20:42 ` [PATCH igt 3/6] kms_frontbuffer_tracking: move more code to get_sink_crc() Paulo Zanoni
2016-12-22 20:42 ` [PATCH igt 4/6] kms_frontbuffer_tracking: refactor sink CRC reliability handling Paulo Zanoni
2017-01-05 9:44 ` Petri Latvala
2016-12-22 20:42 ` [PATCH igt 5/6] kms_frontbuffer_tracking: destroy all FBs from all formats Paulo Zanoni
2016-12-22 20:42 ` [PATCH igt 6/6] kms_frontbuffer_tracking: fix compression checking Paulo Zanoni
2016-12-27 14:59 ` [PATCH igt 1/6] tests/kms_draw_crc: remove unnecessary mode unset calls Daniel Vetter
2016-12-27 15:40 ` Paulo Zanoni [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1482853219.2598.6.camel@intel.com \
--to=paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox