From: Ander Conselvan De Oliveira <conselvan2@gmail.com>
To: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] drm/i915: Call the sync_hw hook for power wells without a domain
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 11:31:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1487237461.3185.4.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1487159944-12862-3-git-send-email-imre.deak@intel.com>
On Wed, 2017-02-15 at 13:59 +0200, Imre Deak wrote:
> So far the sync_hw hook wasn't called for power wells not belonging to
> any power domain, that is the GEN9 PW1 and MISC_IO power wells. This
> wasn't a problem so far since the goal of the sync_hw hook - to clear
> the corresponding BIOS request bit - was guaranteed by clearing the
> whole BIOS request register elsewhere. This will change with the next
> patch, so fix up the inconsistency.
>
> Cc: Ander Conselvan de Oliveira <conselvan2@gmail.com>
> Cc: David Weinehall <david.weinehall@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> index 0f64bc1..f9aff26 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> @@ -49,17 +49,24 @@
> * present for a given platform.
> */
>
> -#define for_each_power_well(i, power_well, domain_mask, power_domains) \
> - for (i = 0; \
> - i < (power_domains)->power_well_count && \
> +#define for_each_power_well(i, power_well) \
> + for ((i) = 0; \
> + (i) < (power_domains)->power_well_count && \
This now requires that power_domains is in scope to work properly. Would it make
sense to still pass that as argument to the macro or, alternatively, pass
dev_priv? Could probably nuke the i parameter too, since no caller uses it?
But either way,
Reviewed-by: Ander Conselvan de Oliveira <conselvan2@gmail.com>
> ((power_well) = &(power_domains)->power_wells[i]); \
> - i++) \
> + (i)++)
> +
> +#define for_each_power_well_rev(i, power_well) \
> + for ((i) = (power_domains)->power_well_count - 1; \
> + (i) >= 0 && ((power_well) = &(power_domains)->power_wells[i]);\
> + (i)--)
> +
> +#define for_each_power_domain_well(i, power_well, domain_mask, power_domains) \
> + for_each_power_well(i, power_well) \
> for_each_if ((power_well)->domains & (domain_mask))
>
> -#define for_each_power_well_rev(i, power_well, domain_mask, power_domains) \
> - for (i = (power_domains)->power_well_count - 1; \
> - i >= 0 && ((power_well) = &(power_domains)->power_wells[i]);\
> - i--) \
> +#define for_each_power_domain_well_rev(i, power_well, domain_mask, \
> + power_domains) \
> + for_each_power_well_rev(i, power_well) \
> for_each_if ((power_well)->domains & (domain_mask))
>
> bool intel_display_power_well_is_enabled(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> @@ -210,7 +217,8 @@ bool __intel_display_power_is_enabled(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>
> is_enabled = true;
>
> - for_each_power_well_rev(i, power_well, BIT_ULL(domain), power_domains) {
> + for_each_power_domain_well_rev(i, power_well, BIT_ULL(domain),
> + power_domains) {
> if (power_well->always_on)
> continue;
>
> @@ -1665,7 +1673,8 @@ __intel_display_power_get_domain(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> struct i915_power_well *power_well;
> int i;
>
> - for_each_power_well(i, power_well, BIT_ULL(domain), power_domains)
> + for_each_power_domain_well(i, power_well, BIT_ULL(domain),
> + power_domains)
> intel_power_well_get(dev_priv, power_well);
>
> power_domains->domain_use_count[domain]++;
> @@ -1760,7 +1769,8 @@ void intel_display_power_put(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> intel_display_power_domain_str(domain));
> power_domains->domain_use_count[domain]--;
>
> - for_each_power_well_rev(i, power_well, BIT_ULL(domain), power_domains)
> + for_each_power_domain_well_rev(i, power_well, BIT_ULL(domain),
> + power_domains)
> intel_power_well_put(dev_priv, power_well);
>
> mutex_unlock(&power_domains->lock);
> @@ -2427,7 +2437,7 @@ static void intel_power_domains_sync_hw(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> int i;
>
> mutex_lock(&power_domains->lock);
> - for_each_power_well(i, power_well, POWER_DOMAIN_MASK, power_domains) {
> + for_each_power_well(i, power_well) {
> power_well->ops->sync_hw(dev_priv, power_well);
> power_well->hw_enabled = power_well->ops->is_enabled(dev_priv,
> power_well);
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-16 9:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-15 11:59 [PATCH 0/4] drm/i915: Fix clearing of BIOS power well requests Imre Deak
2017-02-15 11:59 ` [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915: Remove redundant toggling from the power well sync_hw hooks Imre Deak
2017-02-16 9:13 ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
2017-02-15 11:59 ` [PATCH 2/4] drm/i915: Call the sync_hw hook for power wells without a domain Imre Deak
2017-02-16 9:31 ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira [this message]
2017-02-16 14:55 ` Imre Deak
2017-02-15 11:59 ` [PATCH 3/4] drm/i915/gen9: Fix clearing of the BIOS power well request register Imre Deak
2017-02-16 9:43 ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
2017-02-16 15:13 ` Imre Deak
2017-02-15 11:59 ` [PATCH 4/4] drm/i915: Preserve the state of power wells not explicitly enabled Imre Deak
2017-02-16 12:18 ` Ander Conselvan De Oliveira
2017-02-16 12:41 ` Imre Deak
2017-02-15 14:52 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915: Fix clearing of BIOS power well requests Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1487237461.3185.4.camel@gmail.com \
--to=conselvan2@gmail.com \
--cc=imre.deak@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox