public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
	Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] drm/i915: Start writeback from the shrinker
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2017 17:07:04 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1497362824.5158.5.camel@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170609110350.1767-5-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>

On pe, 2017-06-09 at 12:03 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> When we are called to relieve mempressue via the shrinker, the only way
> we can make progress is either by discarding unwanted pages (those
> objects that userspace has marked MADV_DONTNEED) or by reclaiming the
> dirty objects via swap. As we know that is the only way to make further
> progress, we can initiate the writeback as we invalidate the objects.
> This means the objects we put onto the inactive anon lru list are
> already marked for reclaim+writeback and so will trigger a wait upon the
> writeback inside direct reclaim, greatly improving the success rate of
> direct reclaim on i915 objects.
> 
> The corollary is that we may start a slow swap on opportunistic
> mempressure from the likes of the compaction + migration kthreads. This
> is limited by those threads only being allowed to shrink idle pages, but
> also that if we reactivate the page before it is swapped out by gpu
> activity, we only page the cost of repinning the page. The cost is most
> felt when an object is reused after mempressure, which hopefully
> excludes the latency sensitive tasks (as we are just extending the
> impact of swap thrashing to them).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
> Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>

<SNIP>

> +static void __start_writeback(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
> +{

<SNIP>

> +	/* Force any other users of this object to refault */
> +	mapping = obj->base.filp->f_mapping;
> +	unmap_mapping_range(mapping, 0, (loff_t)-1, 0);
> +
> +	/* Begin writeback on each dirty page */
> +	for (i = 0; i < obj->base.size >> PAGE_SHIFT; i++) {
> +		struct page *page;
> +
> +		page = find_lock_entry(mapping, i);
> +		if (!page || radix_tree_exceptional_entry(page))
> +			continue;
> +
> +		if (!page_mapped(page) && clear_page_dirty_for_io(page)) {
> +			int ret;
> +
> +			SetPageReclaim(page);
> +			ret = mapping->a_ops->writepage(page, &wbc);
> +			if (!PageWriteback(page))
> +				ClearPageReclaim(page);
> +			if (!ret)
> +				goto put;
> +		}
> +		unlock_page(page);
> +put:
> +		put_page(page);
> +	}

Apart from this part (which should probably be a helper function
outside of i915), the code is:

Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>

Regards, Joonas
-- 
Joonas Lahtinen
Open Source Technology Center
Intel Corporation
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-06-13 14:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-06-09 11:03 [PATCH v2 1/5] drm/i915: Encourage our shrinker more when our shmemfs allocations fails Chris Wilson
2017-06-09 11:03 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] drm/i915: Remove __GFP_NORETRY from our buffer allocator Chris Wilson
2017-06-09 11:07   ` Michal Hocko
2017-06-13 14:01   ` Joonas Lahtinen
2017-06-09 11:03 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] drm/i915: Only restrict noreclaim in the early shrink passes Chris Wilson
2017-06-13 14:02   ` Joonas Lahtinen
2017-06-09 11:03 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] drm/i915: Spin for struct_mutex inside shrinker Chris Wilson
2017-06-13 13:59   ` Joonas Lahtinen
2017-06-09 11:03 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] drm/i915: Start writeback from the shrinker Chris Wilson
2017-06-09 11:17   ` Michal Hocko
2017-06-09 11:51     ` Chris Wilson
2017-06-09 13:35       ` Michal Hocko
2017-06-13 14:07   ` Joonas Lahtinen [this message]
2017-06-14 10:03     ` Chris Wilson
2017-06-09 11:31 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [v2,1/5] drm/i915: Encourage our shrinker more when our shmemfs allocations fails Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1497362824.5158.5.camel@linux.intel.com \
    --to=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=matthew.auld@intel.com \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox