From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 5/7] vfio: Define vfio based dma-buf operations
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2017 12:24:42 +0200
Message-ID: <1497608682.30239.3.camel@redhat.com>
References: <1497513611-2814-1-git-send-email-xiaoguang.chen@intel.com>
         <1497513611-2814-6-git-send-email-xiaoguang.chen@intel.com>
         <f19da207-a7f5-d3d3-4577-b071e7d75cf7@nvidia.com>
         <1497542438.29252.1.camel@redhat.com> <20170615143833.7526351b@w520.home>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20170615143833.7526351b@w520.home>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Cc: Kirti Wankhede <kwankhede@nvidia.com>, Xiaoguang Chen <xiaoguang.chen@intel.com>, chris@chris-wilson.co.uk, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, zhenyuw@linux.intel.com, zhiyuan.lv@intel.com, intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org, zhi.a.wang@intel.com, kevin.tian@intel.com
List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org

  Hi,

> I'm not sure I agree regarding the vgpu statement, maybe this is not
> dmabuf specific, but what makes it vgpu specific?  We need to
> separate
> our current usage plans from what it's actually describing and I
> don't
> see that it describes anything vgpu specific.

Well, it describes a framebuffer, what non-graphic device would need
that?

cheers,
  Gerd