public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jim Bride <jim.bride@linux.intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>,
	Wayne Boyer <wayne.boyer@intel.com>,
	Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>,
	Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 RESEND 1/4] drm/i915/psr: Clean-up intel_enable_source_psr1()
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2017 09:48:08 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1501001291-2708-2-git-send-email-jim.bride@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1501001291-2708-1-git-send-email-jim.bride@linux.intel.com>

On SKL+ there is a bit in SRD_CTL that software is not supposed to
modify, but we currently clobber that bit when we enable PSR.  In
order to preserve the value of that bit, go ahead and read SRD_CTL and
do a field-wise setting of the various bits that we need to initialize
before writing the register back out.  Additionally, go ahead and
explicitly disable single-frame update since we aren't currently
supporting it.

v2: * Do a field-wise init on EDP_PSR_MAX_SLEEP_TIME even though we
      always set it to the max value. (Rodrigo)
    * Rebase
v3-v4: * Rebase

Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Cc: Wayne Boyer <wayne.boyer@intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jim Bride <jim.bride@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h  |  4 ++++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++--
 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
index c712d01..3e62429 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
@@ -3789,18 +3789,22 @@ enum {
 #define   EDP_PSR_MIN_LINK_ENTRY_TIME_4_LINES	(1<<25)
 #define   EDP_PSR_MIN_LINK_ENTRY_TIME_2_LINES	(2<<25)
 #define   EDP_PSR_MIN_LINK_ENTRY_TIME_0_LINES	(3<<25)
+#define   EDP_PSR_MAX_SLEEP_TIME_MASK           (0x1f<<20)
 #define   EDP_PSR_MAX_SLEEP_TIME_SHIFT		20
 #define   EDP_PSR_SKIP_AUX_EXIT			(1<<12)
 #define   EDP_PSR_TP1_TP2_SEL			(0<<11)
 #define   EDP_PSR_TP1_TP3_SEL			(1<<11)
+#define   EDP_PSR_TP2_TP3_TIME_MASK             (3<<8)
 #define   EDP_PSR_TP2_TP3_TIME_500us		(0<<8)
 #define   EDP_PSR_TP2_TP3_TIME_100us		(1<<8)
 #define   EDP_PSR_TP2_TP3_TIME_2500us		(2<<8)
 #define   EDP_PSR_TP2_TP3_TIME_0us		(3<<8)
+#define   EDP_PSR_TP1_TIME_MASK                 (0x3<<4)
 #define   EDP_PSR_TP1_TIME_500us		(0<<4)
 #define   EDP_PSR_TP1_TIME_100us		(1<<4)
 #define   EDP_PSR_TP1_TIME_2500us		(2<<4)
 #define   EDP_PSR_TP1_TIME_0us			(3<<4)
+#define   EDP_PSR_IDLE_FRAME_MASK               (0xf<<0)
 #define   EDP_PSR_IDLE_FRAME_SHIFT		0
 
 #define EDP_PSR_AUX_CTL				_MMIO(dev_priv->psr_mmio_base + 0x10)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
index 559f1ab..132987b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c
@@ -280,17 +280,32 @@ static void intel_enable_source_psr1(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
 	 * with the 5 or 6 idle patterns.
 	 */
 	uint32_t idle_frames = max(6, dev_priv->vbt.psr.idle_frames);
-	uint32_t val = EDP_PSR_ENABLE;
+	uint32_t val = I915_READ(EDP_PSR_CTL);
 
+	val |= EDP_PSR_ENABLE;
+
+	val &= ~EDP_PSR_MAX_SLEEP_TIME_MASK;
 	val |= max_sleep_time << EDP_PSR_MAX_SLEEP_TIME_SHIFT;
+
+	val &= ~EDP_PSR_IDLE_FRAME_MASK;
 	val |= idle_frames << EDP_PSR_IDLE_FRAME_SHIFT;
 
+	val &= ~EDP_PSR_MIN_LINK_ENTRY_TIME_MASK;
 	if (IS_HASWELL(dev_priv))
 		val |= EDP_PSR_MIN_LINK_ENTRY_TIME_8_LINES;
 
-	if (dev_priv->psr.link_standby)
+	if (dev_priv->psr.link_standby) {
 		val |= EDP_PSR_LINK_STANDBY;
 
+		/* SFU should only be enabled with link standby, but for
+		 * now we do not support it. */
+		val &= ~BDW_PSR_SINGLE_FRAME;
+	} else {
+		val &= ~EDP_PSR_LINK_STANDBY;
+		val &= ~BDW_PSR_SINGLE_FRAME;
+	}
+
+	val &= ~EDP_PSR_TP1_TIME_MASK;
 	if (dev_priv->vbt.psr.tp1_wakeup_time > 5)
 		val |= EDP_PSR_TP1_TIME_2500us;
 	else if (dev_priv->vbt.psr.tp1_wakeup_time > 1)
@@ -300,6 +315,7 @@ static void intel_enable_source_psr1(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
 	else
 		val |= EDP_PSR_TP1_TIME_0us;
 
+	val &= ~EDP_PSR_TP2_TP3_TIME_MASK;
 	if (dev_priv->vbt.psr.tp2_tp3_wakeup_time > 5)
 		val |= EDP_PSR_TP2_TP3_TIME_2500us;
 	else if (dev_priv->vbt.psr.tp2_tp3_wakeup_time > 1)
@@ -309,6 +325,7 @@ static void intel_enable_source_psr1(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
 	else
 		val |= EDP_PSR_TP2_TP3_TIME_0us;
 
+	val &= ~EDP_PSR_TP1_TP3_SEL;
 	if (intel_dp_source_supports_hbr2(intel_dp) &&
 	    drm_dp_tps3_supported(intel_dp->dpcd))
 		val |= EDP_PSR_TP1_TP3_SEL;
-- 
2.7.4

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2017-07-25 16:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-07-25 16:48 [PATCH v4 RESEND 0/4] Kernel PSR Fix-ups Jim Bride
2017-07-25 16:48 ` Jim Bride [this message]
2017-08-03 18:08   ` [PATCH v4 RESEND 1/4] drm/i915/psr: Clean-up intel_enable_source_psr1() Rodrigo Vivi
2017-07-25 16:48 ` [PATCH v4 RESEND 2/4] drm/i915/psr: Account for sink CRC raciness on some panels Jim Bride
2017-07-25 16:48 ` [PATCH v4 RESEND 3/4] drm/i915/edp: Be less aggressive about changing link config on eDP Jim Bride
2017-08-03 18:10   ` Rodrigo Vivi
2017-07-25 16:48 ` [PATCH v4 RESEND 4/4] drm/i915/edp: Allow alternate fixed mode for eDP if available Jim Bride
2017-07-28 19:22   ` [PATCH v5] " Jim Bride
2017-08-03  7:30     ` David Weinehall
2017-07-25 17:13 ` [PATCH v4 RESEND 0/4] Kernel PSR Fix-ups David Weinehall
2017-07-26 17:09   ` Jim Bride
2017-07-25 17:15 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for " Patchwork
2017-07-30 10:47 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: warning for Kernel PSR Fix-ups (rev2) Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1501001291-2708-2-git-send-email-jim.bride@linux.intel.com \
    --to=jim.bride@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
    --cc=paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    --cc=wayne.boyer@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox