From: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
To: "Lofstedt, Marta" <marta.lofstedt@intel.com>,
"intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org"
<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH i-g-t] tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking: increase FBC wait timeout to 5s
Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2017 11:54:09 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1502117649.2563.2.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA5F6A4B62957246A95956419746064382A358EB@IRSMSX106.ger.corp.intel.com>
Em Seg, 2017-08-07 às 06:51 +0000, Lofstedt, Marta escreveu:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Zanoni, Paulo R
> > Sent: Friday, August 4, 2017 9:56 PM
> > To: Lofstedt, Marta <marta.lofstedt@intel.com>; intel-
> > gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > Cc: Latvala, Petri <petri.latvala@intel.com>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH i-g-t] tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking: increase
> > FBC wait
> > timeout to 5s
> >
> > Em Sex, 2017-08-04 às 09:47 +0000, Lofstedt, Marta escreveu:
> > > +Paolo
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Lofstedt, Marta
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2017 2:17 PM
> > > > To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > > > Cc: Latvala, Petri <petri.latvala@intel.com>; Lofstedt, Marta
> > > > <marta.lofstedt@intel.com>
> > > > Subject: [PATCH i-g-t] tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking: increase
> > > > FBC
> > > > wait timeout to 5s
> > > >
> > > > The subtests: igt@kms_frontbuffer_tracking@fbc-*draw*
> > > > has non-consistent results, pending between fail and pass.
> > > > The fails are always due to "FBC disabled".
> > > > With this increase in timeout the flip-flop behavior is no
> > > > longer
> > > > reproducible.
> >
> > This is a partial revert of:
> >
> > 64590c7b768dc8d8dd962f812d5ff5a39e7e8b54
> > kms_frontbuffer_tracking: reduce the FBC wait timeout to 2s
> >
> > (but there's no need to make it a full revert if you don't need)
> >
> > It would be nice to investigate why we're needing 5 seconds instead
> > of
> > 2 now, the document it in the commit message. Also document that
> > this is a
> > partial revert.
>
> Paulo, do you have data backing up that 2 seconds was ever OK, I fail
> ~1/10 on various fbc subtests.
All the data I have is the commit message of 64590c7b and the testing I
did. I would imagine something changed in the upstream tree since then,
causing this to need a longer timeout, that's why I suggested
investigating.
>
> /Marta
> >
> > Acked-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
> >
>
> Thanks,
>
> > > >
> > > > Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101623
> > > > Signed-off-by: Marta Lofstedt <marta.lofstedt@intel.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking.c | 2 +-
> > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking.c
> > > > b/tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking.c
> > > > index c24e4a81..8bec5d5a 100644
> > > > --- a/tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking.c
> > > > +++ b/tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking.c
> > > > @@ -923,7 +923,7 @@ static bool fbc_stride_not_supported(void)
> > > >
> > > > static bool fbc_wait_until_enabled(void) {
> > > > - return igt_wait(fbc_is_enabled(), 2000, 1);
> > > > + return igt_wait(fbc_is_enabled(), 5000, 1);
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > static bool psr_wait_until_enabled(void)
> > > > --
> > > > 2.11.0
> > >
> > >
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-07 14:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-28 11:16 [PATCH i-g-t] tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking: increase FBC wait timeout to 5s Marta Lofstedt
2017-08-04 9:47 ` Lofstedt, Marta
2017-08-04 18:56 ` Paulo Zanoni
2017-08-07 6:51 ` Lofstedt, Marta
2017-08-07 14:54 ` Paulo Zanoni [this message]
2017-08-08 11:14 ` Lofstedt, Marta
2017-08-11 10:16 ` Lofstedt, Marta
2017-08-25 10:40 ` [PATCH i-g-t v2] " Marta Lofstedt
2017-08-25 10:46 ` Petri Latvala
2017-08-25 10:47 ` Chris Wilson
2017-08-25 11:54 ` Lofstedt, Marta
2017-08-25 12:50 ` Lofstedt, Marta
2017-08-25 13:11 ` Chris Wilson
2017-08-25 13:33 ` Lofstedt, Marta
2017-08-29 7:16 ` Lofstedt, Marta
2017-09-01 19:12 ` Paulo Zanoni
2017-09-04 10:45 ` Chris Wilson
2017-09-04 18:26 ` Paulo Zanoni
2017-08-25 12:24 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for tests/kms_frontbuffer_tracking: increase FBC wait timeout to 5s (rev2) Patchwork
2017-08-25 17:40 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1502117649.2563.2.camel@intel.com \
--to=paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=marta.lofstedt@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox