public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] drm/i915: Only free the oldest stale object before a fresh allocation
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2017 16:53:59 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1502891639.6625.10.camel@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170812115122.10854-6-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>

On Sat, 2017-08-12 at 12:51 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Inspired by Tvrtko's critique of the reaping of the stale contexts
> before allocating a new one, also limit the freed object reaping to the
> oldest stale object before allocating a fresh object. Unlike contexts,
> objects may have radically different sizes of backing storage, but
> similar to contexts, whilst we want to prevent starvation due to
> excessive freed lists, we also want do not want to delay fresh
> allocations for too long. Only freeing the oldest on the freed object
> list before each allocation is a reasonable compromise.
> 
> v2: Only a single consumer of llist_del_first() is allowed (although
> multiple llist_add are still allowed in parallel). Unlike
> i915_gem_context, i915_gem_flush_free_objects() is itself not serialized
> and so we need to add our own spinlock. Otherwise KASAN eventually spots
> a use-after-free for the race on *first->next.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> #v1

<SNIP>

> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> @@ -1466,6 +1466,7 @@ struct i915_gem_mm {
>  	 */
>  	struct llist_head free_list;
>  	struct work_struct free_work;
> +	spinlock_t free_lock;

Please document the scope of this lock here.

Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>

Regards, Joonas
-- 
Joonas Lahtinen
Open Source Technology Center
Intel Corporation
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2017-08-16 13:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-08-12 11:51 [PATCH 1/6] drm/i915: Refactor testing obj->mm.pages Chris Wilson
2017-08-12 11:51 ` [PATCH 2/6] drm/i915: Remove walk over obj->vma_list for the shrinker Chris Wilson
2017-08-15 14:56   ` Joonas Lahtinen
2017-08-15 15:05     ` Chris Wilson
2017-08-15 16:17     ` [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Rename obj->pin_display to obj->pin_global Chris Wilson
2017-08-15 16:17       ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Drop debugfs/i915_gem_pin_display Chris Wilson
2017-08-12 11:51 ` [PATCH 3/6] drm/i915: Move dev_priv->mm.[un]bound_list to its own lock Chris Wilson
2017-08-16 13:13   ` Joonas Lahtinen
2017-08-12 11:51 ` [PATCH 4/6] drm/i915: Set our shrinker->batch to 4096 (~16MiB) Chris Wilson
2017-08-16 13:39   ` Joonas Lahtinen
2017-08-16 13:55     ` Chris Wilson
2017-08-16 14:23       ` [PATCH v2] " Chris Wilson
2017-08-18 12:56         ` Chris Wilson
2017-08-18 22:48           ` Chris Wilson
2017-09-20 13:28       ` [PATCH 4/6] " Joonas Lahtinen
2017-09-26 15:02         ` Chris Wilson
2017-09-27  8:38           ` Joonas Lahtinen
2017-09-27  8:54             ` Chris Wilson
2017-08-12 11:51 ` [PATCH 5/6] drm/i915: Trim struct_mutex hold duration for i915_gem_free_objects Chris Wilson
2017-08-12 11:51 ` [PATCH 6/6] drm/i915: Only free the oldest stale object before a fresh allocation Chris Wilson
2017-08-16 13:53   ` Joonas Lahtinen [this message]
2017-08-12 12:09 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [1/6] drm/i915: Refactor testing obj->mm.pages Patchwork
2017-08-15 16:46 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [1/6] drm/i915: Refactor testing obj->mm.pages (rev3) Patchwork
2017-08-16 14:54 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [1/6] drm/i915: Refactor testing obj->mm.pages (rev4) Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1502891639.6625.10.camel@linux.intel.com \
    --to=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox