From: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] drm/i915: Only free the oldest stale object before a fresh allocation
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2017 16:53:59 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1502891639.6625.10.camel@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170812115122.10854-6-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
On Sat, 2017-08-12 at 12:51 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Inspired by Tvrtko's critique of the reaping of the stale contexts
> before allocating a new one, also limit the freed object reaping to the
> oldest stale object before allocating a fresh object. Unlike contexts,
> objects may have radically different sizes of backing storage, but
> similar to contexts, whilst we want to prevent starvation due to
> excessive freed lists, we also want do not want to delay fresh
> allocations for too long. Only freeing the oldest on the freed object
> list before each allocation is a reasonable compromise.
>
> v2: Only a single consumer of llist_del_first() is allowed (although
> multiple llist_add are still allowed in parallel). Unlike
> i915_gem_context, i915_gem_flush_free_objects() is itself not serialized
> and so we need to add our own spinlock. Otherwise KASAN eventually spots
> a use-after-free for the race on *first->next.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> #v1
<SNIP>
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> @@ -1466,6 +1466,7 @@ struct i915_gem_mm {
> */
> struct llist_head free_list;
> struct work_struct free_work;
> + spinlock_t free_lock;
Please document the scope of this lock here.
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Regards, Joonas
--
Joonas Lahtinen
Open Source Technology Center
Intel Corporation
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-16 13:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-12 11:51 [PATCH 1/6] drm/i915: Refactor testing obj->mm.pages Chris Wilson
2017-08-12 11:51 ` [PATCH 2/6] drm/i915: Remove walk over obj->vma_list for the shrinker Chris Wilson
2017-08-15 14:56 ` Joonas Lahtinen
2017-08-15 15:05 ` Chris Wilson
2017-08-15 16:17 ` [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Rename obj->pin_display to obj->pin_global Chris Wilson
2017-08-15 16:17 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Drop debugfs/i915_gem_pin_display Chris Wilson
2017-08-12 11:51 ` [PATCH 3/6] drm/i915: Move dev_priv->mm.[un]bound_list to its own lock Chris Wilson
2017-08-16 13:13 ` Joonas Lahtinen
2017-08-12 11:51 ` [PATCH 4/6] drm/i915: Set our shrinker->batch to 4096 (~16MiB) Chris Wilson
2017-08-16 13:39 ` Joonas Lahtinen
2017-08-16 13:55 ` Chris Wilson
2017-08-16 14:23 ` [PATCH v2] " Chris Wilson
2017-08-18 12:56 ` Chris Wilson
2017-08-18 22:48 ` Chris Wilson
2017-09-20 13:28 ` [PATCH 4/6] " Joonas Lahtinen
2017-09-26 15:02 ` Chris Wilson
2017-09-27 8:38 ` Joonas Lahtinen
2017-09-27 8:54 ` Chris Wilson
2017-08-12 11:51 ` [PATCH 5/6] drm/i915: Trim struct_mutex hold duration for i915_gem_free_objects Chris Wilson
2017-08-12 11:51 ` [PATCH 6/6] drm/i915: Only free the oldest stale object before a fresh allocation Chris Wilson
2017-08-16 13:53 ` Joonas Lahtinen [this message]
2017-08-12 12:09 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [1/6] drm/i915: Refactor testing obj->mm.pages Patchwork
2017-08-15 16:46 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [1/6] drm/i915: Refactor testing obj->mm.pages (rev3) Patchwork
2017-08-16 14:54 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [1/6] drm/i915: Refactor testing obj->mm.pages (rev4) Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1502891639.6625.10.camel@linux.intel.com \
--to=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox