From: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
To: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/23] drm/i915: introduce simple gemfs
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2017 17:33:05 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1504017185.5001.71.camel@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170821183503.12246-3-matthew.auld@intel.com>
On Mon, 2017-08-21 at 19:34 +0100, Matthew Auld wrote:
> Not a fully blown gemfs, just our very own tmpfs kernel mount. Doing so
> moves us away from the shmemfs shm_mnt, and gives us the much needed
> flexibility to do things like set our own mount options, namely huge=
> which should allow us to enable the use of transparent-huge-pages for
> our shmem backed objects.
>
> v2: various improvements suggested by Joonas
>
> v3: move gemfs instance to i915.mm and simplify now that we have
> file_setup_with_mnt
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name>
> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
> Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
<SNIP>
> @@ -4288,6 +4289,25 @@ static const struct drm_i915_gem_object_ops i915_gem_object_ops = {
> .pwrite = i915_gem_object_pwrite_gtt,
> };
>
> +static int i915_gem_object_create_shmem(struct drm_device *dev,
> + struct drm_gem_object *obj,
> + size_t size)
> +{
> + struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(dev);
> + struct file *filp;
> +
> + drm_gem_private_object_init(dev, obj, size);
> +
> + filp = shmem_file_setup_with_mnt(i915->mm.gemfs, "i915", size,
> + VM_NORESERVE);
Can you double-check that /proc/meminfo is unaffected by this change?
If we stop appearing under "Shemem:" we maybe need to maybe highlight
this somewhere (at least in commit message).
<SNIP>
> +int i915_gemfs_init(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
> +{
> + struct file_system_type *type;
> + struct vfsmount *gemfs;
> +
> + type = get_fs_type("tmpfs");
> + if (!type)
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> + gemfs = kern_mount(type);
> + if (IS_ERR(gemfs))
> + return PTR_ERR(gemfs);
By occasionally checking that "i915->mm.gemfs" might be NULL, could we
continue without our own gemfs mount and just lose the additional
features? Or is it not worth the hassle?
Anyway, this is:
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Regards, Joonas
--
Joonas Lahtinen
Open Source Technology Center
Intel Corporation
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-29 14:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-21 18:34 [PATCH 00/23] huge gtt pages Matthew Auld
2017-08-21 18:34 ` [PATCH 01/23] mm/shmem: introduce shmem_file_setup_with_mnt Matthew Auld
2017-08-23 9:31 ` Joonas Lahtinen
2017-08-23 22:34 ` Andrew Morton
2017-08-24 12:04 ` Matthew Auld
2017-08-25 20:49 ` Andrew Morton
2017-08-29 14:09 ` Joonas Lahtinen
2017-08-21 18:34 ` [PATCH 02/23] drm/i915: introduce simple gemfs Matthew Auld
2017-08-29 14:33 ` Joonas Lahtinen [this message]
2017-08-21 18:34 ` [PATCH 03/23] drm/i915/gemfs: enable THP Matthew Auld
2017-08-29 14:49 ` Joonas Lahtinen
2017-09-04 12:09 ` Matthew Auld
2017-08-21 18:34 ` [PATCH 04/23] drm/i915: introduce page_size_mask to dev_info Matthew Auld
2017-08-21 18:34 ` [PATCH 05/23] drm/i915: push set_pages down to the callers Matthew Auld
2017-08-29 14:44 ` Joonas Lahtinen
2017-08-21 18:34 ` [PATCH 06/23] drm/i915: introduce page_size members Matthew Auld
2017-09-05 9:25 ` Joonas Lahtinen
2017-08-21 18:34 ` [PATCH 07/23] drm/i915: introduce vm set_pages/clear_pages Matthew Auld
2017-08-21 18:34 ` [PATCH 08/23] drm/i915: align the vma start to the largest gtt page size Matthew Auld
2017-08-21 18:34 ` [PATCH 09/23] drm/i915: align 64K objects to 2M Matthew Auld
2017-08-21 18:34 ` [PATCH 10/23] drm/i915: enable IPS bit for 64K pages Matthew Auld
2017-08-21 18:34 ` [PATCH 11/23] drm/i915: disable GTT cache for 2M/1G pages Matthew Auld
2017-08-21 18:34 ` [PATCH 12/23] drm/i915: support 1G pages for the 48b PPGTT Matthew Auld
2017-08-21 18:34 ` [PATCH 13/23] drm/i915: support 2M " Matthew Auld
2017-08-21 18:34 ` [PATCH 14/23] drm/i915: add support for 64K scratch page Matthew Auld
2017-08-21 18:34 ` [PATCH 15/23] drm/i915: support 64K pages for the 48b PPGTT Matthew Auld
2017-08-21 18:34 ` [PATCH 16/23] drm/i915: accurate page size tracking for the ppgtt Matthew Auld
2017-08-21 18:34 ` [PATCH 17/23] drm/i915/debugfs: include some gtt page size metrics Matthew Auld
2017-08-21 18:34 ` [PATCH 18/23] drm/i915/selftests: huge page tests Matthew Auld
2017-08-24 17:56 ` kbuild test robot
2017-08-28 14:36 ` Chris Wilson
2017-08-21 18:34 ` [PATCH 19/23] drm/i915/selftests: mix huge pages Matthew Auld
2017-08-21 18:35 ` [PATCH 20/23] drm/i915: disable platform support for vGPU huge gtt pages Matthew Auld
2017-08-21 18:35 ` [PATCH 21/23] drm/i915: enable platform support for 64K pages Matthew Auld
2017-08-21 18:35 ` [PATCH 22/23] drm/i915: enable platform support for 2M pages Matthew Auld
2017-08-21 18:35 ` [PATCH 23/23] drm/i915: enable platform support for 1G pages Matthew Auld
2017-08-21 18:54 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for huge gtt pages (rev7) Patchwork
2017-08-22 14:21 ` [PATCH 00/23] huge gtt pages Chris Wilson
2017-08-22 14:23 ` Chris Wilson
2017-08-22 15:23 ` Matthew Auld
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1504017185.5001.71.camel@linux.intel.com \
--to=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=matthew.auld@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox