public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>,
	Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/cnl: Avoid ioremap_wc on Cannonlake as well.
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2017 14:38:30 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1504093110.8378.13.camel@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <150409239420.916.10895581910032833575@mail.alporthouse.com>

On Wed, 2017-08-30 at 12:26 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Quoting Joonas Lahtinen (2017-08-30 12:13:29)
> > On Tue, 2017-08-29 at 16:09 -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> > > Driver’s CPU access to GTT is via the GTTMMADR BAR.
> > > 
> > > The current HW implementation of that BAR is to only
> > > support <= DW (and maybe QW) writes—not 16/32/64B writes
> > > that could occur with WC and/or SSE/AVX moves.
> > > 
> > > GTTMMADR must be marked uncacheable (UC).
> > > Accesses to GTTMMADR(GTT), must be 64 bits or less (ie. 1 GTT entry).
> > > 
> > > v2: Get clarification on the reasons and spec is getting
> > >     updated to reflect it now.
> > > 
> > > Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
> > > Suggested-by: Ben Widawsky <benjamin.widawsky@intel.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> > 
> > Rodrigo, can you double-check how this interacts with the patch from
> > Zhi that adds the WB flag to PPAT_CACHE_INDEX on CNL.
> 
> Different issue (or should be). The ioremap concerns access through the
> PCI BAR, affecting how fast we insert entries into the GGTT (so
> establishing new mmaps following frequent runtime pm, loading of new
> contexts + rings, as well as the stressful GGTT thrashing). PPAT affects
> how the device accesses the physical pages, not the PTE themselves.

Yes, I know it should be :) But Rodrigo also described pretty random
hangs, IIRC not much was pinpointing to either of the issues. With
these two bugs present, device could be operating without write-back on
certain pages, or could be operating on wrong pages altogether.

I'd just like one round of testing to try to avoid this change if we
can.

Regards, Joonas
-- 
Joonas Lahtinen
Open Source Technology Center
Intel Corporation
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2017-08-30 11:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-08-11 23:39 [PATCH] drm/i915/cnl: Avoid ioremap_wc on Cannonlake as well Rodrigo Vivi
2017-08-12  0:11 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2017-08-12  0:36 ` [PATCH] " Rodrigo Vivi
2017-08-14 12:13   ` Joonas Lahtinen
2017-08-14 17:24     ` Vivi, Rodrigo
2017-08-29 23:09       ` Rodrigo Vivi
2017-08-30 11:13         ` Joonas Lahtinen
2017-08-30 11:26           ` Chris Wilson
2017-08-30 11:38             ` Joonas Lahtinen [this message]
2017-08-30 17:58               ` Vivi, Rodrigo
2017-08-31  8:27                 ` Joonas Lahtinen
2017-08-31 16:45                   ` Vivi, Rodrigo
2017-08-30  0:16 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for drm/i915/cnl: Avoid ioremap_wc on Cannonlake as well. (rev2) Patchwork
2017-08-30  4:33 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: warning " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1504093110.8378.13.camel@linux.intel.com \
    --to=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox