From: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
To: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/13] drm/i915: Let's use more enum intel_dpll_id pll_id.
Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2017 12:33:34 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1507023214.3274.27.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171003070614.18396-2-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
On Tue, 2017-10-03 at 00:06 -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> No functional change expected. Just let's use this enum
> when possible and also same standard pll_id name
> so we can rework gen9+ port clock later.
>
> Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
> Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++----------
> ------
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
> index 93cbbcbbc193..b5dd82a0e357 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ddi.c
> @@ -1102,14 +1102,14 @@ static int hsw_ddi_calc_wrpll_link(struct
> drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> }
>
> static int skl_calc_wrpll_link(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> - uint32_t dpll)
> + enum intel_dpll_id pll_id)
> {
> i915_reg_t cfgcr1_reg, cfgcr2_reg;
> uint32_t cfgcr1_val, cfgcr2_val;
> uint32_t p0, p1, p2, dco_freq;
>
> - cfgcr1_reg = DPLL_CFGCR1(dpll);
> - cfgcr2_reg = DPLL_CFGCR2(dpll);
> + cfgcr1_reg = DPLL_CFGCR1(pll_id);
> + cfgcr2_reg = DPLL_CFGCR2(pll_id);
>
> cfgcr1_val = I915_READ(cfgcr1_reg);
> cfgcr2_val = I915_READ(cfgcr2_reg);
> @@ -1162,7 +1162,7 @@ static int skl_calc_wrpll_link(struct
> drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> }
>
> static int cnl_calc_wrpll_link(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> - uint32_t pll_id)
> + enum intel_dpll_id pll_id)
> {
> uint32_t cfgcr0, cfgcr1;
> uint32_t p0, p1, p2, dco_freq, ref_clock;
> @@ -1246,7 +1246,8 @@ static void cnl_ddi_clock_get(struct
> intel_encoder *encoder,
> {
> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(encoder-
> >base.dev);
> int link_clock = 0;
> - uint32_t cfgcr0, pll_id;
> + uint32_t cfgcr0;
> + enum intel_dpll_id pll_id;
>
> pll_id = intel_get_shared_dpll_id(dev_priv, pipe_config-
> >shared_dpll);
>
> @@ -1299,17 +1300,18 @@ static void skl_ddi_clock_get(struct
> intel_encoder *encoder,
> {
> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(encoder-
> >base.dev);
> int link_clock = 0;
> - uint32_t dpll_ctl1, dpll;
> + uint32_t dpll_ctl1;
> + enum intel_dpll_id pll_id;
>
> - dpll = intel_get_shared_dpll_id(dev_priv, pipe_config-
> >shared_dpll);
> + pll_id = intel_get_shared_dpll_id(dev_priv, pipe_config-
> >shared_dpll);
>
> dpll_ctl1 = I915_READ(DPLL_CTRL1);
>
> - if (dpll_ctl1 & DPLL_CTRL1_HDMI_MODE(dpll)) {
> - link_clock = skl_calc_wrpll_link(dev_priv, dpll);
> + if (dpll_ctl1 & DPLL_CTRL1_HDMI_MODE(pll_id)) {
> + link_clock = skl_calc_wrpll_link(dev_priv, pll_id);
> } else {
> - link_clock = dpll_ctl1 &
> DPLL_CTRL1_LINK_RATE_MASK(dpll);
> - link_clock >>= DPLL_CTRL1_LINK_RATE_SHIFT(dpll);
> + link_clock = dpll_ctl1 &
> DPLL_CTRL1_LINK_RATE_MASK(pll_id);
> + link_clock >>= DPLL_CTRL1_LINK_RATE_SHIFT(pll_id);
>
> switch (link_clock) {
> case DPLL_CTRL1_LINK_RATE_810:
> @@ -1390,17 +1392,17 @@ static void hsw_ddi_clock_get(struct
> intel_encoder *encoder,
> }
>
> static int bxt_calc_pll_link(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> - enum intel_dpll_id dpll)
> + enum intel_dpll_id pll_id)
> {
> struct intel_shared_dpll *pll;
> struct intel_dpll_hw_state *state;
> struct dpll clock;
>
> /* For DDI ports we always use a shared PLL. */
> - if (WARN_ON(dpll == DPLL_ID_PRIVATE))
> + if (WARN_ON(pll_id == DPLL_ID_PRIVATE))
> return 0;
>
> - pll = &dev_priv->shared_dplls[dpll];
> + pll = &dev_priv->shared_dplls[pll_id];
> state = &pll->state.hw_state;
>
> clock.m1 = 2;
> @@ -1419,9 +1421,9 @@ static void bxt_ddi_clock_get(struct
> intel_encoder *encoder,
> {
> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(encoder-
> >base.dev);
> enum port port = intel_ddi_get_encoder_port(encoder);
> - uint32_t dpll = port;
> + enum intel_dpll_id pll_id = port;
>
> - pipe_config->port_clock = bxt_calc_pll_link(dev_priv, dpll);
> + pipe_config->port_clock = bxt_calc_pll_link(dev_priv,
> pll_id);
>
> ddi_dotclock_get(pipe_config);
> }
--
Mika Kahola - Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-03 9:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-03 7:06 [PATCH 00/13] DVFS v2 Rodrigo Vivi
2017-10-03 7:06 ` [PATCH 01/13] drm/i915: Let's use more enum intel_dpll_id pll_id Rodrigo Vivi
2017-10-03 9:33 ` Mika Kahola [this message]
2017-10-03 7:06 ` [PATCH 02/13] drm/i915/cnl: Extract cnl_calc_pll_link following bxt style Rodrigo Vivi
2017-10-03 10:00 ` Mika Kahola
2017-10-03 7:06 ` [PATCH 03/13] drm/i915/skl: Extract skl_calc_pll_link following bxt, cnl style Rodrigo Vivi
2017-10-03 13:18 ` Mika Kahola
2017-10-03 7:06 ` [PATCH 04/13] drm/i915: Unify and export gen9+ port_clock calculation Rodrigo Vivi
2017-10-04 6:39 ` Mika Kahola
2017-10-04 19:38 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2017-10-04 21:26 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2017-10-05 10:49 ` Mika Kahola
2017-10-03 7:06 ` [PATCH 05/13] drm/i915/cnl: extract cnl_dvfs_{pre, post}_change Rodrigo Vivi
2017-10-04 21:58 ` Ausmus, James
2017-10-04 22:05 ` Manasi Navare
2017-10-03 7:06 ` [PATCH 06/13] drm/i915/cnl: Expose DVFS change functions Rodrigo Vivi
2017-10-04 22:07 ` Manasi Navare
2017-10-03 7:06 ` [PATCH 07/13] drm/i915/cnl: DVFS for PLL enabling Rodrigo Vivi
2017-10-04 22:22 ` Manasi Navare
2017-10-17 15:44 ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-10-17 16:47 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2017-10-17 17:23 ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-10-17 17:45 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2017-10-17 18:02 ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-10-17 20:36 ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-10-17 23:23 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2017-10-18 13:23 ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-10-03 7:06 ` [PATCH 08/13] drm/i915/cnl: DVFS for PLL disabling Rodrigo Vivi
2017-10-04 22:23 ` Manasi Navare
2017-10-03 7:06 ` [PATCH 09/13] drm/i915/cnl: Invert dvfs default level Rodrigo Vivi
2017-10-04 9:46 ` Mika Kahola
2017-10-04 19:36 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2017-10-04 22:40 ` Manasi Navare
2017-10-04 23:03 ` Manasi Navare
2017-10-03 7:06 ` [PATCH 10/13] drm/i915/cnl: Unify dvfs level selection Rodrigo Vivi
2017-10-04 13:20 ` Mika Kahola
2017-10-05 14:59 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2017-10-18 18:22 ` Paulo Zanoni
2017-10-03 7:06 ` [PATCH 11/13] drm/i915/cnl: Only request voltage frequency switching when needed Rodrigo Vivi
2017-10-05 12:07 ` Mika Kahola
2017-10-05 15:00 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2017-10-03 7:06 ` [PATCH 12/13] drm/i915/cnl: When disabling pll put dvfs back to cdclk requirement Rodrigo Vivi
2017-10-03 7:06 ` [PATCH 13/13] drm/i915: Make DVFS more generic and document them Rodrigo Vivi
2017-10-03 7:42 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for DVFS v2 Patchwork
2017-10-03 9:07 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: warning " Patchwork
2017-10-03 19:51 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1507023214.3274.27.camel@intel.com \
--to=mika.kahola@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox