From: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
To: Oscar Mateo <oscar.mateo@intel.com>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>, Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915/cnl: Do not add an extra page for precaution in the Gen10 LRC size
Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2017 13:44:30 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1507113870.5856.2.camel@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1ee0027e-7a40-7a38-87e1-0b8984fd465e@intel.com>
On Tue, 2017-10-03 at 08:46 -0700, Oscar Mateo wrote:
>
> On 10/03/2017 05:25 AM, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
> > On Mon, 2017-10-02 at 13:31 -0700, Oscar Mateo wrote:
> > > BSpec indicates exactly 16750 DWORDs (17 pages), plus one page for PPHWSP.
> >
> > Assuming this is;
> >
> > Bspec: 1383
> >
> > I'm actually getting 16801 DWORDs by copy-pasting to spreadsheet and
> > summing up. Are we looking from different places?
>
> No, we are looking at the same BSpec page, but you need to filter by
> "CNL" (that will remove some fields). Even then, I'm now getting 16752
> instead of 16750 (maybe they have updated some tags?).
> I'll resend with the BSpec tag, the new count and your RB, if that's OK.
Yep, that's fine. Do include a note in the commit message that there
are exclusions of rows in the BSpec table, so when looking back, one is
reminded that copy and paste is not enough :)
Regards, Joonas
--
Joonas Lahtinen
Open Source Technology Center
Intel Corporation
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-04 10:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-02 20:31 [PATCH] drm/i915/cnl: Do not add an extra page for precaution in the Gen10 LRC size Oscar Mateo
2017-10-02 21:10 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2017-10-02 22:31 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2017-10-03 12:25 ` [PATCH] " Joonas Lahtinen
2017-10-03 15:46 ` Oscar Mateo
2017-10-04 10:44 ` Joonas Lahtinen [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-10-03 15:49 Oscar Mateo
2017-10-04 15:39 Oscar Mateo
2017-10-05 17:05 ` Chris Wilson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1507113870.5856.2.camel@linux.intel.com \
--to=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ben@bwidawsk.net \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=oscar.mateo@intel.com \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox