Re: [CI i-g-t] tests: Drop gem_bad_length as redundant

[Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>]

On Tue, 2017-10-10 at 15:28 +0300, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
> From: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
> 
> Most of the gem_bad_length code is compiled out because creating
> a zero-length object is not allowed anymore by i915 and thus it is
> not possible to execute it. The remaining part checks that creation of
> a zero-length object does indeed fail, which is also checked by
> gem_create/create-invalid-size.
> The only difference between the 2 tests is that gem_bad_length checks
> specifically for EINVAL while create-invalid-size only looks for
> failure, so after adding the EINVAL check to create-invalid-size it is
> safe to drop gem_bad_length.
> 
> v2 (Joonas):
> - Clarify header line, split the patch, fix Meson build and add Cc:
> 
> Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>

Merged the patch.

Regards, Joonas
-- 
Joonas Lahtinen
Open Source Technology Center
Intel Corporation
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx