public inbox for intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oscar Mateo <oscar.mateo@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 09/22] drm/i915: Print all workaround types correctly in debugfs
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2017 13:54:03 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1507928056-6966-10-git-send-email-oscar.mateo@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1507928056-6966-1-git-send-email-oscar.mateo@intel.com>

Let's try to make sure that all WAs are applied correctly and survive
resumes, resets, etc... (with some help from a companion i-g-t patch).

v2:
  - Rebased
  - Print display WAs as well (Ville)

Signed-off-by: Oscar Mateo <oscar.mateo@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
index f108f53..11fb9c3 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
@@ -3399,6 +3399,20 @@ static int i915_shared_dplls_info(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static void check_wa_register(struct seq_file *m, struct i915_wa_reg *wa_reg)
+{
+	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = node_to_i915(m->private);
+	u32 read;
+	bool ok;
+
+	read = I915_READ(wa_reg->addr);
+	ok = (wa_reg->value & wa_reg->mask) == (read & wa_reg->mask);
+	seq_printf(m, "0x%X: 0x%08x, mask: 0x%08x, read: 0x%08x, status: %s\n",
+		   i915_mmio_reg_offset(wa_reg->addr),
+		   wa_reg->value, wa_reg->mask, read,
+		   ok ? "OK" : "FAIL");
+}
+
 static int i915_wa_registers(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
 {
 	int i;
@@ -3408,6 +3422,7 @@ static int i915_wa_registers(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
 	struct drm_device *dev = &dev_priv->drm;
 	struct i915_workarounds *workarounds = &dev_priv->workarounds;
 	enum intel_engine_id id;
+	u32 whitelist_wa_count = 0;
 
 	ret = mutex_lock_interruptible(&dev->struct_mutex);
 	if (ret)
@@ -3416,22 +3431,32 @@ static int i915_wa_registers(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
 	intel_runtime_pm_get(dev_priv);
 
 	seq_printf(m, "Context workarounds applied: %d\n", workarounds->ctx_wa_count);
-	for_each_engine(engine, dev_priv, id)
-		seq_printf(m, "HW whitelist count for %s: %d\n",
-			   engine->name, workarounds->whitelist_wa_count[id]);
 	for (i = 0; i < workarounds->ctx_wa_count; ++i) {
-		i915_reg_t addr;
-		u32 mask, value, read;
-		bool ok;
-
-		addr = workarounds->ctx_wa_reg[i].addr;
-		mask = workarounds->ctx_wa_reg[i].mask;
-		value = workarounds->ctx_wa_reg[i].value;
-		read = I915_READ(addr);
-		ok = (value & mask) == (read & mask);
-		seq_printf(m, "0x%X: 0x%08X, mask: 0x%08X, read: 0x%08x, status: %s\n",
-			   i915_mmio_reg_offset(addr), value, mask, read, ok ? "OK" : "FAIL");
+		struct i915_wa_reg *wa_reg = &workarounds->ctx_wa_reg[i];
+
+		seq_printf(m, "0x%X: 0x%08x, mask: 0x%08x\n",
+			   i915_mmio_reg_offset(wa_reg->addr),
+			   wa_reg->value, wa_reg->mask);
 	}
+	seq_putc(m, '\n');
+
+	seq_printf(m, "GT workarounds applied: %d\n", workarounds->gt_wa_count);
+	for (i = 0; i < workarounds->gt_wa_count; ++i)
+		check_wa_register(m, &workarounds->gt_wa_reg[i]);
+	seq_putc(m, '\n');
+
+	seq_printf(m, "Display workarounds applied: %d\n", workarounds->display_wa_count);
+	for (i = 0; i < workarounds->display_wa_count; ++i)
+		check_wa_register(m, &workarounds->display_wa_reg[i]);
+	seq_putc(m, '\n');
+
+	for_each_engine(engine, dev_priv, id)
+		whitelist_wa_count += workarounds->whitelist_wa_count[id];
+	seq_printf(m, "Whitelist workarounds applied: %d\n", whitelist_wa_count);
+	for_each_engine(engine, dev_priv, id)
+		for (i = 0; i < workarounds->whitelist_wa_count[id]; ++i)
+			check_wa_register(m, &workarounds->whitelist_wa_reg[id][i]);
+	seq_putc(m, '\n');
 
 	intel_runtime_pm_put(dev_priv);
 	mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
-- 
1.9.1

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-10-13 20:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-10-13 20:53 [PATCH v3 00/22] Refactor HW workaround code Oscar Mateo
2017-10-13 20:53 ` [PATCH v3 01/22] drm/i915: Use a mask when applying WaProgramL3SqcReg1Default Oscar Mateo
2017-10-13 21:28   ` Chris Wilson
2017-10-14  0:26     ` Michel Thierry
2017-10-13 20:53 ` [PATCH v3 02/22] drm/i915: No need for RING_MAX_NONPRIV_SLOTS space Oscar Mateo
2017-10-13 20:53 ` [PATCH v3 03/22] drm/i915: Move a bunch of workaround-related code to its own file Oscar Mateo
2017-10-13 20:53 ` [PATCH v3 04/22] drm/i915: Split out functions for different kinds of workarounds Oscar Mateo
2017-10-13 20:53 ` [PATCH v3 05/22] drm/i915: Rename saved workarounds to make it explicit that they are context WAs Oscar Mateo
2017-10-13 20:54 ` [PATCH v3 06/22] drm/i915: Save all GT WAs and apply them at a later time Oscar Mateo
2017-10-17 12:37   ` Chris Wilson
2017-10-13 20:54 ` [PATCH v3 07/22] drm/i915: Save all Whitelist " Oscar Mateo
2017-10-17 12:38   ` Chris Wilson
2017-10-13 20:54 ` [PATCH v3 08/22] drm/i915: Create a new category of display WAs Oscar Mateo
2017-10-17 12:42   ` Chris Wilson
2017-10-13 20:54 ` Oscar Mateo [this message]
2017-10-17 12:45   ` [PATCH v3 09/22] drm/i915: Print all workaround types correctly in debugfs Chris Wilson
2017-10-13 20:54 ` [PATCH v3 10/22] drm/i915: Move WA BB stuff to the workarounds file as well Oscar Mateo
2017-10-17 12:49   ` Chris Wilson
2017-10-13 20:54 ` [PATCH v3 11/22] drm/i915/cnl: Move GT and Display workarounds from init_clock_gating Oscar Mateo
2017-10-17 12:52   ` Chris Wilson
2017-10-17 21:22     ` Oscar Mateo
2017-10-18 12:44   ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-10-30 20:05     ` Oscar Mateo
2017-10-13 20:54 ` [PATCH v3 12/22] drm/i915/gen9: " Oscar Mateo
2017-10-17 12:53   ` Chris Wilson
2017-10-13 20:54 ` [PATCH v3 13/22] drm/i915/gen9: Remove Gen9 WAs with no effect Oscar Mateo
2017-10-13 20:54 ` [PATCH v3 14/22] drm/i915/cfl: Move GT and Display workarounds from init_clock_gating Oscar Mateo
2017-10-17 12:54   ` Chris Wilson
2017-10-13 20:54 ` [PATCH v3 15/22] drm/i915/glk: " Oscar Mateo
2017-10-17 12:57   ` Chris Wilson
2017-10-13 20:54 ` [PATCH v3 16/22] drm/i915/kbl: " Oscar Mateo
2017-10-17 12:58   ` Chris Wilson
2017-10-13 20:54 ` [PATCH v3 17/22] drm/i915/bxt: " Oscar Mateo
2017-10-17 12:58   ` Chris Wilson
2017-10-13 20:54 ` [PATCH v3 18/22] drm/i915/skl: " Oscar Mateo
2017-10-17 12:59   ` Chris Wilson
2017-10-13 20:54 ` [PATCH v3 19/22] drm/i915/chv: " Oscar Mateo
2017-10-17 13:02   ` Chris Wilson
2017-10-13 20:54 ` [PATCH v3 20/22] drm/i915/bdw: " Oscar Mateo
2017-10-17 13:03   ` Chris Wilson
2017-10-30 20:08     ` Oscar Mateo
2017-10-13 20:54 ` [PATCH v3 21/22] drm/i915: Move WaProgramL3SqcReg1Default to the workarounds file Oscar Mateo
2017-10-17 13:05   ` Chris Wilson
2017-10-13 20:54 ` [PATCH v3 22/22] drm/i915: Document the i915_workarounds file Oscar Mateo
2017-10-13 21:48 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for Refactor HW workaround code (rev3) Patchwork
2017-10-17 13:06 ` [PATCH v3 00/22] Refactor HW workaround code Chris Wilson
2017-10-30 20:07   ` Oscar Mateo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1507928056-6966-10-git-send-email-oscar.mateo@intel.com \
    --to=oscar.mateo@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox