Re: [PATCH 7/8] drm/i915: Use cdclk_state->voltage on CNL

[Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>]

On Thu, 2017-10-19 at 13:48 +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 02:50:59PM -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> > 
> > On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 08:48:24PM +0000, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> > > 
> > > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> > > 
> > > Track the system agent voltage we request from pcode in the cdclk
> > > state
> > > on CNL. Annoyingly we can't actually read out the current value
> > > since
> > > there's no pcode command to do that, so we'll have to just assume
> > > that
> > > it worked.
> > +static u32 cnl_cur_voltage(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> > +{
> > +       u32 voltage;
> > +       sandybridge_pcode_read(dev_priv, SKL_PCODE_CDCLK_CONTROL,
> > &voltage);
> I don't think that'll work. _pcode_read() and _pcode_write() are
> actually
> the same thing, the only difference is whether we return the
> resulting value
> or not. Thus if we actually tried to do this we'd end up setting the
> voltage instead of reading it. 
> 
> The only way to actually read anything is for pcode to specify a
> specific read command. It's a rather unfortunate design of the
> mailbox interface :(
> 
> We should perhaps put some WARNS into the pcode read/write functions
> so
> that people don't accidentally use them in the wrong way.
+1 for this. I was under the assumption that *read* means just reading
out the value.

> 
> > 
> > +       return voltage;
> > +}
> > +
> >  static void cnl_get_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> >                          struct intel_cdclk_state *cdclk_state)
> >  {
> > @@ -1486,8 +1493,7 @@ static void cnl_get_cdclk(struct
> > drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> >  
> >         cdclk_state->cdclk = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(cdclk_state->vco,
> > div);
> >  
> > +       cdclk_state->voltage = cnl_cur_voltage(dev_priv);
> >  }
> >  
> >  static void cnl_cdclk_pll_disable(struct drm_i915_private
> > *dev_priv)
> > @@ -1594,8 +1600,7 @@ static void cnl_set_cdclk(struct
> > drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> >  
> >         intel_update_cdclk(dev_priv);
> >  
> > +       dev_priv->cdclk.hw.voltage = cnl_cur_voltage(dev_priv);
> > 
> > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Cc: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola@intel.com>
> > > Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare@intel.com>
> > > Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c | 44
> > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> > >  1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c
> > > index 1b4dcd9689da..795a18f64c4c 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_cdclk.c
> > > @@ -1505,6 +1505,19 @@ static int cnl_calc_cdclk(int min_cdclk)
> > >  		return 168000;
> > >  }
> > >  
> > > +static u8 cnl_calc_voltage(int cdclk)
> > > +{
> > > +	switch (cdclk) {
> > > +	default:
> > > +	case 168000:
> > > +		return 0;
> > > +	case 336000:
> > > +		return 1;
> > > +	case 528000:
> > > +		return 2;
> > > +	}
> > > +}
> > where is the port_clock taking into account?
> Last patch of the series.
> 
> > 
> > 
> > > 
> > > +
> > >  static void cnl_cdclk_pll_update(struct drm_i915_private
> > > *dev_priv,
> > >  				 struct intel_cdclk_state
> > > *cdclk_state)
> > >  {
> > > @@ -1538,7 +1551,7 @@ static void cnl_get_cdclk(struct
> > > drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> > >  	cdclk_state->cdclk = cdclk_state->ref;
> > >  
> > >  	if (cdclk_state->vco == 0)
> > > -		return;
> > > +		goto out;
> > >  
> > >  	divider = I915_READ(CDCLK_CTL) &
> > > BXT_CDCLK_CD2X_DIV_SEL_MASK;
> > >  
> > > @@ -1555,6 +1568,13 @@ static void cnl_get_cdclk(struct
> > > drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> > >  	}
> > >  
> > >  	cdclk_state->cdclk = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(cdclk_state->vco, 
> > > div);
> > > +
> > > + out:
> > > +	/*
> > > +	 * Can't read this out :( Let's assume it's
> > > +	 * at least what the CDCLK frequency requires.
> > > +	 */
> > > +	cdclk_state->voltage = cnl_calc_voltage(cdclk_state-
> > > >cdclk);
> > >  }
> > >  
> > >  static void cnl_cdclk_pll_disable(struct drm_i915_private
> > > *dev_priv)
> > > @@ -1595,7 +1615,7 @@ static void cnl_set_cdclk(struct
> > > drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> > >  {
> > >  	int cdclk = cdclk_state->cdclk;
> > >  	int vco = cdclk_state->vco;
> > > -	u32 val, divider, pcu_ack;
> > > +	u32 val, divider;
> > >  	int ret;
> > >  
> > >  	mutex_lock(&dev_priv->pcu_lock);
> > > @@ -1624,19 +1644,6 @@ static void cnl_set_cdclk(struct
> > > drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> > >  		break;
> > >  	}
> > >  
> > > -	switch (cdclk) {
> > > -	case 528000:
> > > -		pcu_ack = 2;
> > > -		break;
> > > -	case 336000:
> > > -		pcu_ack = 1;
> > > -		break;
> > > -	case 168000:
> > > -	default:
> > > -		pcu_ack = 0;
> > > -		break;
> > > -	}
> > > -
> > >  	if (dev_priv->cdclk.hw.vco != 0 &&
> > >  	    dev_priv->cdclk.hw.vco != vco)
> > >  		cnl_cdclk_pll_disable(dev_priv);
> > > @@ -1654,7 +1661,8 @@ static void cnl_set_cdclk(struct
> > > drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> > >  
> > >  	/* inform PCU of the change */
> > >  	mutex_lock(&dev_priv->pcu_lock);
> > > -	sandybridge_pcode_write(dev_priv,
> > > SKL_PCODE_CDCLK_CONTROL, pcu_ack);
> > > +	sandybridge_pcode_write(dev_priv,
> > > SKL_PCODE_CDCLK_CONTROL,
> > > +				cdclk_state->voltage);
> > >  	mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->pcu_lock);
> > >  
> > >  	intel_update_cdclk(dev_priv);
> > > @@ -1747,6 +1755,7 @@ void cnl_init_cdclk(struct drm_i915_private
> > > *dev_priv)
> > >  
> > >  	cdclk_state.cdclk = cnl_calc_cdclk(0);
> > >  	cdclk_state.vco = cnl_cdclk_pll_vco(dev_priv,
> > > cdclk_state.cdclk);
> > > +	cdclk_state.voltage =
> > > cnl_calc_voltage(cdclk_state.cdclk);
> > >  
> > >  	cnl_set_cdclk(dev_priv, &cdclk_state);
> > >  }
> > > @@ -1764,6 +1773,7 @@ void cnl_uninit_cdclk(struct
> > > drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> > >  
> > >  	cdclk_state.cdclk = cdclk_state.ref;
> > >  	cdclk_state.vco = 0;
> > > +	cdclk_state.voltage =
> > > cnl_calc_voltage(cdclk_state.cdclk);
> > >  
> > >  	cnl_set_cdclk(dev_priv, &cdclk_state);
> > >  }
> > > @@ -2081,6 +2091,7 @@ static int cnl_modeset_calc_cdclk(struct
> > > drm_atomic_state *state)
> > >  
> > >  	intel_state->cdclk.logical.vco = vco;
> > >  	intel_state->cdclk.logical.cdclk = cdclk;
> > > +	intel_state->cdclk.logical.voltage =
> > > cnl_calc_voltage(cdclk);
> > >  
> > >  	if (!intel_state->active_crtcs) {
> > >  		cdclk = cnl_calc_cdclk(0);
> > > @@ -2088,6 +2099,7 @@ static int cnl_modeset_calc_cdclk(struct
> > > drm_atomic_state *state)
> > >  
> > >  		intel_state->cdclk.actual.vco = vco;
> > >  		intel_state->cdclk.actual.cdclk = cdclk;
> > > +		intel_state->cdclk.actual.voltage =
> > > cnl_calc_voltage(cdclk);
> > >  	} else {
> > >  		intel_state->cdclk.actual =
> > >  			intel_state->cdclk.logical;
> > > -- 
> > > 2.13.6
> > > 
-- 
Mika Kahola - Intel OTC

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx