* [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/selftests: Don't try to queue a request with zero delay
@ 2017-10-24 22:08 Chris Wilson
2017-10-24 22:08 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Use same test for eviction and submitting kernel context Chris Wilson
` (5 more replies)
0 siblings, 6 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Chris Wilson @ 2017-10-24 22:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx
Instead of trying to create a timer with zero delay (i.e. with expires
set to the current jiffies and not the future, an already expired
timer), execute that request immediately.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/mock_engine.c | 22 +++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/mock_engine.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/mock_engine.c
index 331c2b09869e..24ea1ef7efec 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/mock_engine.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/mock_engine.c
@@ -39,15 +39,16 @@ static void hw_delay_complete(struct timer_list *t)
spin_lock(&engine->hw_lock);
- request = first_request(engine);
- if (request) {
+ while ((request = first_request(engine))) {
list_del_init(&request->link);
mock_seqno_advance(&engine->base, request->base.global_seqno);
+ if (request->delay)
+ break;
}
-
- request = first_request(engine);
- if (request)
+ if (request) {
+ GEM_BUG_ON(!request->delay);
mod_timer(&engine->hw_delay, jiffies + request->delay);
+ }
spin_unlock(&engine->hw_lock);
}
@@ -98,8 +99,15 @@ static void mock_submit_request(struct drm_i915_gem_request *request)
spin_lock_irq(&engine->hw_lock);
list_add_tail(&mock->link, &engine->hw_queue);
- if (mock->link.prev == &engine->hw_queue)
- mod_timer(&engine->hw_delay, jiffies + mock->delay);
+ if (mock->link.prev == &engine->hw_queue) {
+ if (mock->delay) {
+ mod_timer(&engine->hw_delay, jiffies + mock->delay);
+ } else {
+ list_del_init(&mock->link);
+ mock_seqno_advance(&engine->base,
+ mock->base.global_seqno);
+ }
+ }
spin_unlock_irq(&engine->hw_lock);
}
--
2.15.0.rc2
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Use same test for eviction and submitting kernel context
2017-10-24 22:08 [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/selftests: Don't try to queue a request with zero delay Chris Wilson
@ 2017-10-24 22:08 ` Chris Wilson
2017-10-25 11:07 ` Joonas Lahtinen
2017-10-24 23:31 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [1/2] drm/i915/selftests: Don't try to queue a request with zero delay Patchwork
` (4 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Chris Wilson @ 2017-10-24 22:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx; +Cc: Mika Kuoppala
During evict, we wish to idle the GPU if we see that the GGTT is full.
However, our test for idle in i915_gem_evict_something() and in
i915_gem_switch_to_kernel_context() do not match leading to
disappointment - we never believe that we are idle and keep trying to
flush the GGTT ad infinitum.
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103438
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c | 7 +++----
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_evict.c | 3 ++-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_cs.c | 6 ++++++
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h | 2 ++
4 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c
index 5bf96a258509..4f26f80b1b3e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c
@@ -897,7 +897,7 @@ int i915_switch_context(struct drm_i915_gem_request *req)
return do_rcs_switch(req);
}
-static bool engine_has_kernel_context(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
+static bool engine_has_idle_kernel_context(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
{
struct i915_gem_timeline *timeline;
@@ -913,8 +913,7 @@ static bool engine_has_kernel_context(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
return false;
}
- return (!engine->last_retired_context ||
- i915_gem_context_is_kernel(engine->last_retired_context));
+ return intel_engine_has_kernel_context(engine);
}
int i915_gem_switch_to_kernel_context(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
@@ -931,7 +930,7 @@ int i915_gem_switch_to_kernel_context(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
struct drm_i915_gem_request *req;
int ret;
- if (engine_has_kernel_context(engine))
+ if (engine_has_idle_kernel_context(engine))
continue;
req = i915_gem_request_alloc(engine, dev_priv->kernel_context);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_evict.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_evict.c
index a6b769994d8d..60ca4f05ae94 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_evict.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_evict.c
@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ static bool ggtt_is_idle(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
return false;
for_each_engine(engine, i915, id) {
- if (engine->last_retired_context != i915->kernel_context)
+ if (!intel_engine_has_kernel_context(engine))
return false;
}
@@ -73,6 +73,7 @@ static int ggtt_flush(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
if (err)
return err;
+ GEM_BUG_ON(!ggtt_is_idle(i915));
return 0;
}
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_cs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_cs.c
index ab5bf4e2e28e..f6cdc50d4237 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_cs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_cs.c
@@ -1585,6 +1585,12 @@ bool intel_engines_are_idle(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
return true;
}
+bool intel_engine_has_kernel_context(const struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
+{
+ return (!engine->last_retired_context ||
+ i915_gem_context_is_kernel(engine->last_retired_context));
+}
+
void intel_engines_reset_default_submission(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
{
struct intel_engine_cs *engine;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h
index 6a42ed618a28..a2589aa89163 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h
@@ -866,6 +866,8 @@ static inline u32 *gen8_emit_pipe_control(u32 *batch, u32 flags, u32 offset)
bool intel_engine_is_idle(struct intel_engine_cs *engine);
bool intel_engines_are_idle(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
+bool intel_engine_has_kernel_context(const struct intel_engine_cs *engine);
+
void intel_engines_mark_idle(struct drm_i915_private *i915);
void intel_engines_reset_default_submission(struct drm_i915_private *i915);
--
2.15.0.rc2
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [1/2] drm/i915/selftests: Don't try to queue a request with zero delay
2017-10-24 22:08 [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/selftests: Don't try to queue a request with zero delay Chris Wilson
2017-10-24 22:08 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Use same test for eviction and submitting kernel context Chris Wilson
@ 2017-10-24 23:31 ` Patchwork
2017-10-25 10:06 ` [PATCH v2] " Chris Wilson
` (3 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2017-10-24 23:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Wilson; +Cc: intel-gfx
== Series Details ==
Series: series starting with [1/2] drm/i915/selftests: Don't try to queue a request with zero delay
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/32582/
State : failure
== Summary ==
Series 32582v1 series starting with [1/2] drm/i915/selftests: Don't try to queue a request with zero delay
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/32582/revisions/1/mbox/
Test chamelium:
Subgroup dp-crc-fast:
pass -> FAIL (fi-kbl-7500u) fdo#102514
Test kms_force_connector_basic:
Subgroup prune-stale-modes:
pass -> SKIP (fi-ivb-3520m)
Test kms_psr_sink_crc:
Subgroup psr_basic:
pass -> INCOMPLETE (fi-cnl-y)
fdo#102514 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102514
fi-bdw-5557u total:289 pass:268 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:21 time:450s
fi-bdw-gvtdvm total:289 pass:265 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:24 time:454s
fi-blb-e6850 total:289 pass:223 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:65 time:371s
fi-bsw-n3050 total:289 pass:243 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:46 time:541s
fi-bwr-2160 total:289 pass:183 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:106 time:262s
fi-bxt-dsi total:289 pass:259 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:30 time:498s
fi-bxt-j4205 total:289 pass:260 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:29 time:500s
fi-byt-j1900 total:289 pass:253 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:35 time:497s
fi-byt-n2820 total:289 pass:249 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:39 time:476s
fi-cfl-s total:289 pass:253 dwarn:4 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:32 time:548s
fi-cnl-y total:289 pass:223 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:24
fi-elk-e7500 total:289 pass:229 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:60 time:421s
fi-gdg-551 total:289 pass:178 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:1 skip:109 time:250s
fi-glk-1 total:289 pass:261 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:28 time:583s
fi-glk-dsi total:289 pass:258 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:1 skip:30 time:488s
fi-hsw-4770 total:289 pass:262 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:27 time:434s
fi-hsw-4770r total:289 pass:262 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:27 time:433s
fi-ilk-650 total:289 pass:228 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:61 time:436s
fi-ivb-3520m total:289 pass:259 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:30 time:483s
fi-ivb-3770 total:289 pass:260 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:29 time:462s
fi-kbl-7500u total:289 pass:263 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:1 skip:24 time:486s
fi-kbl-7560u total:289 pass:270 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:19 time:573s
fi-kbl-7567u total:289 pass:269 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:20 time:474s
fi-kbl-r total:289 pass:262 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:27 time:582s
fi-pnv-d510 total:289 pass:222 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:66 time:540s
fi-skl-6260u total:289 pass:269 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:20 time:450s
fi-skl-6700hq total:289 pass:263 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:26 time:646s
fi-skl-6700k total:289 pass:265 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:24 time:520s
fi-skl-6770hq total:289 pass:269 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:20 time:496s
fi-skl-gvtdvm total:289 pass:266 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:23 time:452s
fi-snb-2520m total:289 pass:250 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:39 time:570s
fi-snb-2600 total:289 pass:249 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:40 time:419s
4971297c57bdd02d8f64cddc9d44c9db6b3478b3 drm-tip: 2017y-10m-24d-17h-29m-57s UTC integration manifest
69d70508cdb9 drm/i915: Use same test for eviction and submitting kernel context
440877a4618e drm/i915/selftests: Don't try to queue a request with zero delay
== Logs ==
For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_6174/
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2] drm/i915/selftests: Don't try to queue a request with zero delay
2017-10-24 22:08 [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/selftests: Don't try to queue a request with zero delay Chris Wilson
2017-10-24 22:08 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Use same test for eviction and submitting kernel context Chris Wilson
2017-10-24 23:31 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [1/2] drm/i915/selftests: Don't try to queue a request with zero delay Patchwork
@ 2017-10-25 10:06 ` Chris Wilson
2017-10-25 10:11 ` Chris Wilson
2017-10-25 10:17 ` [PATCH v3] " Chris Wilson
` (2 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Chris Wilson @ 2017-10-25 10:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx
Instead of trying to create a timer with zero delay (i.e. with expires
set to the current jiffies and not the future, an already expired
timer), execute that request immediately.
v2: Refactor list_del_init+signal into its own little function.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20171024220855.30155-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/mock_engine.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/mock_engine.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/mock_engine.c
index 331c2b09869e..964fd9366813 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/mock_engine.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/mock_engine.c
@@ -32,6 +32,13 @@ static struct mock_request *first_request(struct mock_engine *engine)
link);
}
+static void advance(struct mock_engine *engine,
+ struct mock_request *request)
+{
+ list_del_init(&request->link);
+ mock_seqno_advance(&engine->base, request->base.global_seqno);
+}
+
static void hw_delay_complete(struct timer_list *t)
{
struct mock_engine *engine = from_timer(engine, t, hw_delay);
@@ -39,15 +46,15 @@ static void hw_delay_complete(struct timer_list *t)
spin_lock(&engine->hw_lock);
- request = first_request(engine);
- if (request) {
- list_del_init(&request->link);
- mock_seqno_advance(&engine->base, request->base.global_seqno);
+ while ((request = first_request(engine))) {
+ advance(engine, request);
+ if (request->delay)
+ break;
}
-
- request = first_request(engine);
- if (request)
+ if (request) {
+ GEM_BUG_ON(!request->delay);
mod_timer(&engine->hw_delay, jiffies + request->delay);
+ }
spin_unlock(&engine->hw_lock);
}
@@ -98,8 +105,12 @@ static void mock_submit_request(struct drm_i915_gem_request *request)
spin_lock_irq(&engine->hw_lock);
list_add_tail(&mock->link, &engine->hw_queue);
- if (mock->link.prev == &engine->hw_queue)
- mod_timer(&engine->hw_delay, jiffies + mock->delay);
+ if (mock->link.prev == &engine->hw_queue) {
+ if (mock->delay)
+ mod_timer(&engine->hw_delay, jiffies + mock->delay);
+ else
+ advance(engine, mock);
+ }
spin_unlock_irq(&engine->hw_lock);
}
--
2.15.0.rc2
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] drm/i915/selftests: Don't try to queue a request with zero delay
2017-10-25 10:06 ` [PATCH v2] " Chris Wilson
@ 2017-10-25 10:11 ` Chris Wilson
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Chris Wilson @ 2017-10-25 10:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx
Quoting Chris Wilson (2017-10-25 11:06:01)
> Instead of trying to create a timer with zero delay (i.e. with expires
> set to the current jiffies and not the future, an already expired
> timer), execute that request immediately.
>
> v2: Refactor list_del_init+signal into its own little function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20171024220855.30155-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
> Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Scratch that, the refactor was nice, because it made
> - request = first_request(engine);
> - if (request) {
> - list_del_init(&request->link);
> - mock_seqno_advance(&engine->base, request->base.global_seqno);
> + while ((request = first_request(engine))) {
> + advance(engine, request);
> + if (request->delay)
> + break;
this stand out as bogus.
-Chris
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3] drm/i915/selftests: Don't try to queue a request with zero delay
2017-10-24 22:08 [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/selftests: Don't try to queue a request with zero delay Chris Wilson
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2017-10-25 10:06 ` [PATCH v2] " Chris Wilson
@ 2017-10-25 10:17 ` Chris Wilson
2017-10-25 10:22 ` Joonas Lahtinen
2017-10-25 10:33 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: warning for series starting with [v2] drm/i915/selftests: Don't try to queue a request with zero delay (rev2) Patchwork
2017-10-25 10:51 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: warning for series starting with [v3] drm/i915/selftests: Don't try to queue a request with zero delay (rev3) Patchwork
5 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Chris Wilson @ 2017-10-25 10:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: intel-gfx
Instead of trying to create a timer with zero delay (i.e. with expires
set to the current jiffies and not the future, an already expired
timer), execute that request immediately.
v2: Refactor list_del_init+signal into its own little function.
v3: Reorder testing so as not to immediately signal a delayed request.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20171024220855.30155-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/mock_engine.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/mock_engine.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/mock_engine.c
index 331c2b09869e..0aafa8a105b8 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/mock_engine.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/mock_engine.c
@@ -32,6 +32,13 @@ static struct mock_request *first_request(struct mock_engine *engine)
link);
}
+static void advance(struct mock_engine *engine,
+ struct mock_request *request)
+{
+ list_del_init(&request->link);
+ mock_seqno_advance(&engine->base, request->base.global_seqno);
+}
+
static void hw_delay_complete(struct timer_list *t)
{
struct mock_engine *engine = from_timer(engine, t, hw_delay);
@@ -39,15 +46,23 @@ static void hw_delay_complete(struct timer_list *t)
spin_lock(&engine->hw_lock);
- request = first_request(engine);
- if (request) {
- list_del_init(&request->link);
- mock_seqno_advance(&engine->base, request->base.global_seqno);
- }
-
+ /* Timer fired, first request is complete */
request = first_request(engine);
if (request)
- mod_timer(&engine->hw_delay, jiffies + request->delay);
+ advance(engine, request);
+
+ /*
+ * Also immediately signal any subsequent 0-delay requests, but
+ * requeue the timer for the next delayed request.
+ */
+ while ((request = first_request(engine))) {
+ if (request->delay) {
+ mod_timer(&engine->hw_delay, jiffies + request->delay);
+ break;
+ }
+
+ advance(engine, request);
+ }
spin_unlock(&engine->hw_lock);
}
@@ -98,8 +113,12 @@ static void mock_submit_request(struct drm_i915_gem_request *request)
spin_lock_irq(&engine->hw_lock);
list_add_tail(&mock->link, &engine->hw_queue);
- if (mock->link.prev == &engine->hw_queue)
- mod_timer(&engine->hw_delay, jiffies + mock->delay);
+ if (mock->link.prev == &engine->hw_queue) {
+ if (mock->delay)
+ mod_timer(&engine->hw_delay, jiffies + mock->delay);
+ else
+ advance(engine, mock);
+ }
spin_unlock_irq(&engine->hw_lock);
}
--
2.15.0.rc2
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3] drm/i915/selftests: Don't try to queue a request with zero delay
2017-10-25 10:17 ` [PATCH v3] " Chris Wilson
@ 2017-10-25 10:22 ` Joonas Lahtinen
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Joonas Lahtinen @ 2017-10-25 10:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Wilson, intel-gfx
On Wed, 2017-10-25 at 11:17 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Instead of trying to create a timer with zero delay (i.e. with expires
> set to the current jiffies and not the future, an already expired
> timer), execute that request immediately.
>
> v2: Refactor list_del_init+signal into its own little function.
> v3: Reorder testing so as not to immediately signal a delayed request.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20171024220855.30155-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Regards, Joonas
--
Joonas Lahtinen
Open Source Technology Center
Intel Corporation
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: warning for series starting with [v2] drm/i915/selftests: Don't try to queue a request with zero delay (rev2)
2017-10-24 22:08 [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/selftests: Don't try to queue a request with zero delay Chris Wilson
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2017-10-25 10:17 ` [PATCH v3] " Chris Wilson
@ 2017-10-25 10:33 ` Patchwork
2017-10-25 10:51 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: warning for series starting with [v3] drm/i915/selftests: Don't try to queue a request with zero delay (rev3) Patchwork
5 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2017-10-25 10:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Wilson; +Cc: intel-gfx
== Series Details ==
Series: series starting with [v2] drm/i915/selftests: Don't try to queue a request with zero delay (rev2)
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/32582/
State : warning
== Summary ==
Series 32582v2 series starting with [v2] drm/i915/selftests: Don't try to queue a request with zero delay
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/32582/revisions/2/mbox/
Test chamelium:
Subgroup dp-crc-fast:
pass -> FAIL (fi-kbl-7500u) fdo#102514
Test gem_basic:
Subgroup bad-close:
pass -> DMESG-WARN (fi-bsw-n3050)
fdo#102514 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102514
fi-bdw-5557u total:289 pass:268 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:21 time:445s
fi-bdw-gvtdvm total:289 pass:265 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:24 time:452s
fi-blb-e6850 total:289 pass:223 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:65 time:377s
fi-bsw-n3050 total:289 pass:242 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:46 time:525s
fi-bwr-2160 total:289 pass:183 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:106 time:265s
fi-bxt-dsi total:289 pass:259 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:30 time:514s
fi-bxt-j4205 total:289 pass:260 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:29 time:499s
fi-byt-j1900 total:289 pass:253 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:35 time:497s
fi-byt-n2820 total:289 pass:249 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:39 time:479s
fi-cfl-s total:289 pass:253 dwarn:4 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:32 time:555s
fi-elk-e7500 total:289 pass:229 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:60 time:420s
fi-gdg-551 total:289 pass:178 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:1 skip:109 time:250s
fi-glk-1 total:289 pass:261 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:28 time:582s
fi-glk-dsi total:289 pass:258 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:1 skip:30 time:495s
fi-hsw-4770 total:289 pass:262 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:27 time:449s
fi-hsw-4770r total:289 pass:262 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:27 time:428s
fi-ilk-650 total:289 pass:228 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:61 time:434s
fi-ivb-3520m total:289 pass:260 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:29 time:490s
fi-ivb-3770 total:289 pass:260 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:29 time:459s
fi-kbl-7500u total:289 pass:263 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:1 skip:24 time:485s
fi-kbl-7560u total:289 pass:270 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:19 time:561s
fi-kbl-7567u total:289 pass:269 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:20 time:478s
fi-kbl-r total:289 pass:262 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:27 time:588s
fi-pnv-d510 total:289 pass:222 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:66 time:547s
fi-skl-6260u total:289 pass:269 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:20 time:447s
fi-skl-6600u total:289 pass:262 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:27 time:594s
fi-skl-6700hq total:289 pass:263 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:26 time:652s
fi-skl-6700k total:289 pass:265 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:24 time:519s
fi-skl-6770hq total:289 pass:269 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:20 time:500s
fi-skl-gvtdvm total:289 pass:266 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:23 time:456s
fi-snb-2520m total:289 pass:250 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:39 time:574s
fi-snb-2600 total:289 pass:249 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:40 time:419s
fi-cnl-y failed to connect after reboot
63e85ec6f910933a46b5a50a2a077b6860ed4815 drm-tip: 2017y-10m-24d-20h-52m-45s UTC integration manifest
0146a9c9143e drm/i915: Use same test for eviction and submitting kernel context
384f7469066b drm/i915/selftests: Don't try to queue a request with zero delay
== Logs ==
For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_6177/
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: warning for series starting with [v3] drm/i915/selftests: Don't try to queue a request with zero delay (rev3)
2017-10-24 22:08 [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/selftests: Don't try to queue a request with zero delay Chris Wilson
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2017-10-25 10:33 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: warning for series starting with [v2] drm/i915/selftests: Don't try to queue a request with zero delay (rev2) Patchwork
@ 2017-10-25 10:51 ` Patchwork
5 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Patchwork @ 2017-10-25 10:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Wilson; +Cc: intel-gfx
== Series Details ==
Series: series starting with [v3] drm/i915/selftests: Don't try to queue a request with zero delay (rev3)
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/32582/
State : warning
== Summary ==
Series 32582v3 series starting with [v3] drm/i915/selftests: Don't try to queue a request with zero delay
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/api/1.0/series/32582/revisions/3/mbox/
Test kms_addfb_basic:
Subgroup addfb25-bad-modifier:
pass -> DMESG-WARN (fi-bsw-n3050)
Subgroup basic-x-tiled:
pass -> DMESG-WARN (fi-bsw-n3050)
fi-bdw-5557u total:289 pass:268 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:21 time:447s
fi-bdw-gvtdvm total:289 pass:265 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:24 time:454s
fi-blb-e6850 total:289 pass:223 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:65 time:371s
fi-bsw-n3050 total:289 pass:241 dwarn:2 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:46 time:526s
fi-bwr-2160 total:289 pass:183 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:106 time:263s
fi-bxt-dsi total:289 pass:259 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:30 time:496s
fi-bxt-j4205 total:289 pass:260 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:29 time:496s
fi-byt-j1900 total:289 pass:253 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:35 time:492s
fi-byt-n2820 total:289 pass:249 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:39 time:476s
fi-cfl-s total:289 pass:253 dwarn:4 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:32 time:556s
fi-cnl-y total:289 pass:262 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:27 time:609s
fi-elk-e7500 total:289 pass:229 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:60 time:418s
fi-gdg-551 total:289 pass:178 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:1 skip:109 time:249s
fi-glk-1 total:289 pass:261 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:28 time:579s
fi-glk-dsi total:289 pass:258 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:1 skip:30 time:489s
fi-hsw-4770 total:289 pass:262 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:27 time:456s
fi-hsw-4770r total:289 pass:262 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:27 time:426s
fi-ilk-650 total:289 pass:228 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:61 time:432s
fi-ivb-3520m total:289 pass:260 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:29 time:497s
fi-ivb-3770 total:289 pass:260 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:29 time:457s
fi-kbl-7500u total:289 pass:264 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:24 time:488s
fi-kbl-7560u total:289 pass:270 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:19 time:570s
fi-kbl-7567u total:289 pass:269 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:20 time:475s
fi-kbl-r total:289 pass:262 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:27 time:581s
fi-pnv-d510 total:289 pass:222 dwarn:1 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:66 time:542s
fi-skl-6260u total:289 pass:269 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:20 time:454s
fi-skl-6600u total:289 pass:262 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:27 time:591s
fi-skl-6700hq total:289 pass:263 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:26 time:642s
fi-skl-6700k total:289 pass:265 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:24 time:517s
fi-skl-6770hq total:289 pass:269 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:20 time:500s
fi-skl-gvtdvm total:289 pass:266 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:23 time:455s
fi-snb-2520m total:289 pass:250 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:39 time:563s
fi-snb-2600 total:289 pass:249 dwarn:0 dfail:0 fail:0 skip:40 time:415s
63e85ec6f910933a46b5a50a2a077b6860ed4815 drm-tip: 2017y-10m-24d-20h-52m-45s UTC integration manifest
cb306cdb3289 drm/i915: Use same test for eviction and submitting kernel context
7a762dc73c8c drm/i915/selftests: Don't try to queue a request with zero delay
== Logs ==
For more details see: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_6178/
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Use same test for eviction and submitting kernel context
2017-10-24 22:08 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Use same test for eviction and submitting kernel context Chris Wilson
@ 2017-10-25 11:07 ` Joonas Lahtinen
2017-10-25 15:35 ` Chris Wilson
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Joonas Lahtinen @ 2017-10-25 11:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Chris Wilson, intel-gfx; +Cc: Mika Kuoppala
On Tue, 2017-10-24 at 23:08 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> During evict, we wish to idle the GPU if we see that the GGTT is full.
> However, our test for idle in i915_gem_evict_something() and in
> i915_gem_switch_to_kernel_context() do not match leading to
> disappointment - we never believe that we are idle and keep trying to
> flush the GGTT ad infinitum.
>
> Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103438
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Regards, Joonas
--
Joonas Lahtinen
Open Source Technology Center
Intel Corporation
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Use same test for eviction and submitting kernel context
2017-10-25 11:07 ` Joonas Lahtinen
@ 2017-10-25 15:35 ` Chris Wilson
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Chris Wilson @ 2017-10-25 15:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Joonas Lahtinen, intel-gfx; +Cc: Mika Kuoppala
Quoting Joonas Lahtinen (2017-10-25 12:07:59)
> On Tue, 2017-10-24 at 23:08 +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > During evict, we wish to idle the GPU if we see that the GGTT is full.
> > However, our test for idle in i915_gem_evict_something() and in
> > i915_gem_switch_to_kernel_context() do not match leading to
> > disappointment - we never believe that we are idle and keep trying to
> > flush the GGTT ad infinitum.
> >
> > Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103438
> > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> > Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
> > Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
> > Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Ta, this little fixup now pushed. Afaict, this should only ever affect
the mock selftests, so I considered it to be of low impact and not
require a Fixes:
-Chris
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-10-25 15:35 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-10-24 22:08 [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915/selftests: Don't try to queue a request with zero delay Chris Wilson
2017-10-24 22:08 ` [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: Use same test for eviction and submitting kernel context Chris Wilson
2017-10-25 11:07 ` Joonas Lahtinen
2017-10-25 15:35 ` Chris Wilson
2017-10-24 23:31 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [1/2] drm/i915/selftests: Don't try to queue a request with zero delay Patchwork
2017-10-25 10:06 ` [PATCH v2] " Chris Wilson
2017-10-25 10:11 ` Chris Wilson
2017-10-25 10:17 ` [PATCH v3] " Chris Wilson
2017-10-25 10:22 ` Joonas Lahtinen
2017-10-25 10:33 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: warning for series starting with [v2] drm/i915/selftests: Don't try to queue a request with zero delay (rev2) Patchwork
2017-10-25 10:51 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: warning for series starting with [v3] drm/i915/selftests: Don't try to queue a request with zero delay (rev3) Patchwork
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox