Re: [RFC PATCH 02/20] drm/i915: Move a bunch of workaround-related code to its own file

[Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>]

On Mon, 2017-11-06 at 12:42 +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Quoting Oscar Mateo (2017-11-03 18:09:30)
> > This has grown to be a sizable amount of code, so move it to
> > its own file before we try to refactor anything. For the moment,
> > we are leaving behind the WA BB code and the WAs that get applied
> > (incorrectly) in init_clock_gating, but we will deal with it later.
> > 
> > v2: Use intel_ prefix for code that deals with the hardware (Chris)
> > v3: Rebased
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Oscar Mateo <oscar.mateo@intel.com>
> > Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> > Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
> 
> I would like to start on this reclassifications of w/a early; even just
> moving the current set of register writes into the right groups should
> be a massive help wrt to our confused init ordering.
> 
> Anyone object to moving the existing code around before we get the
> universal solution?

Nope, I was actually going to suggest getting the first patches merged
first. Then it'll then be easier to spin RFCs.

Regards, Joonas
-- 
Joonas Lahtinen
Open Source Technology Center
Intel Corporation
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx