From: Vidya Srinivas <vidya.srinivas@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [PATCH 09/16] drm/i915/skl: split skl_compute_ddb function
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2018 15:22:07 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1518515534-12972-10-git-send-email-vidya.srinivas@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1518515534-12972-1-git-send-email-vidya.srinivas@intel.com>
From: Mahesh Kumar <mahesh1.kumar@intel.com>
This patch splits skl_compute_wm/ddb functions into two parts.
One adds all affected pipes after the commit to atomic_state structure
and second part does compute the DDB.
Signed-off-by: Mahesh Kumar <mahesh1.kumar@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 157 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
1 file changed, 88 insertions(+), 69 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
index a87a95b..48ee2ea 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
@@ -5057,69 +5057,16 @@ skl_ddb_add_affected_planes(struct intel_crtc_state *cstate)
static int
skl_compute_ddb(struct drm_atomic_state *state)
{
- struct drm_device *dev = state->dev;
- struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
+ const struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(state->dev);
struct intel_atomic_state *intel_state = to_intel_atomic_state(state);
- struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc;
struct skl_ddb_allocation *ddb = &intel_state->wm_results.ddb;
- uint32_t realloc_pipes = pipes_modified(state);
- int ret;
-
- /*
- * If this is our first atomic update following hardware readout,
- * we can't trust the DDB that the BIOS programmed for us. Let's
- * pretend that all pipes switched active status so that we'll
- * ensure a full DDB recompute.
- */
- if (dev_priv->wm.distrust_bios_wm) {
- ret = drm_modeset_lock(&dev->mode_config.connection_mutex,
- state->acquire_ctx);
- if (ret)
- return ret;
-
- intel_state->active_pipe_changes = ~0;
-
- /*
- * We usually only initialize intel_state->active_crtcs if we
- * we're doing a modeset; make sure this field is always
- * initialized during the sanitization process that happens
- * on the first commit too.
- */
- if (!intel_state->modeset)
- intel_state->active_crtcs = dev_priv->active_crtcs;
- }
-
- /*
- * If the modeset changes which CRTC's are active, we need to
- * recompute the DDB allocation for *all* active pipes, even
- * those that weren't otherwise being modified in any way by this
- * atomic commit. Due to the shrinking of the per-pipe allocations
- * when new active CRTC's are added, it's possible for a pipe that
- * we were already using and aren't changing at all here to suddenly
- * become invalid if its DDB needs exceeds its new allocation.
- *
- * Note that if we wind up doing a full DDB recompute, we can't let
- * any other display updates race with this transaction, so we need
- * to grab the lock on *all* CRTC's.
- */
- if (intel_state->active_pipe_changes) {
- realloc_pipes = ~0;
- intel_state->wm_results.dirty_pipes = ~0;
- }
+ struct intel_crtc *crtc;
+ struct intel_crtc_state *cstate;
+ int ret, i;
- /*
- * We're not recomputing for the pipes not included in the commit, so
- * make sure we start with the current state.
- */
memcpy(ddb, &dev_priv->wm.skl_hw.ddb, sizeof(*ddb));
- for_each_intel_crtc_mask(dev, intel_crtc, realloc_pipes) {
- struct intel_crtc_state *cstate;
-
- cstate = intel_atomic_get_crtc_state(state, intel_crtc);
- if (IS_ERR(cstate))
- return PTR_ERR(cstate);
-
+ for_each_new_intel_crtc_in_state(intel_state, crtc, cstate, i) {
ret = skl_allocate_pipe_ddb(cstate, ddb);
if (ret)
return ret;
@@ -5181,23 +5128,23 @@ skl_print_wm_changes(const struct drm_atomic_state *state)
}
static int
-skl_compute_wm(struct drm_atomic_state *state)
+skl_ddb_add_affected_pipes(struct drm_atomic_state *state, bool *changed)
{
- struct drm_crtc *crtc;
- struct drm_crtc_state *cstate;
- struct intel_atomic_state *intel_state = to_intel_atomic_state(state);
- struct skl_ddb_values *results = &intel_state->wm_results;
struct drm_device *dev = state->dev;
- struct skl_pipe_wm *pipe_wm;
- bool changed = false;
+ const struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
+ const struct drm_crtc *crtc;
+ const struct drm_crtc_state *cstate;
+ struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc;
+ struct intel_atomic_state *intel_state = to_intel_atomic_state(state);
+ uint32_t realloc_pipes = pipes_modified(state);
int ret, i;
/*
* When we distrust bios wm we always need to recompute to set the
* expected DDB allocations for each CRTC.
*/
- if (to_i915(dev)->wm.distrust_bios_wm)
- changed = true;
+ if (dev_priv->wm.distrust_bios_wm)
+ *changed = true;
/*
* If this transaction isn't actually touching any CRTC's, don't
@@ -5208,14 +5155,86 @@ skl_compute_wm(struct drm_atomic_state *state)
* hold _all_ CRTC state mutexes.
*/
for_each_new_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, cstate, i)
- changed = true;
+ *changed = true;
- if (!changed)
+ if (!*changed)
return 0;
+ /*
+ * If this is our first atomic update following hardware readout,
+ * we can't trust the DDB that the BIOS programmed for us. Let's
+ * pretend that all pipes switched active status so that we'll
+ * ensure a full DDB recompute.
+ */
+ if (dev_priv->wm.distrust_bios_wm) {
+ ret = drm_modeset_lock(&dev->mode_config.connection_mutex,
+ state->acquire_ctx);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ intel_state->active_pipe_changes = ~0;
+
+ /*
+ * We usually only initialize intel_state->active_crtcs if we
+ * we're doing a modeset; make sure this field is always
+ * initialized during the sanitization process that happens
+ * on the first commit too.
+ */
+ if (!intel_state->modeset)
+ intel_state->active_crtcs = dev_priv->active_crtcs;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * If the modeset changes which CRTC's are active, we need to
+ * recompute the DDB allocation for *all* active pipes, even
+ * those that weren't otherwise being modified in any way by this
+ * atomic commit. Due to the shrinking of the per-pipe allocations
+ * when new active CRTC's are added, it's possible for a pipe that
+ * we were already using and aren't changing at all here to suddenly
+ * become invalid if its DDB needs exceeds its new allocation.
+ *
+ * Note that if we wind up doing a full DDB recompute, we can't let
+ * any other display updates race with this transaction, so we need
+ * to grab the lock on *all* CRTC's.
+ */
+ if (intel_state->active_pipe_changes) {
+ realloc_pipes = ~0;
+ intel_state->wm_results.dirty_pipes = ~0;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * We're not recomputing for the pipes not included in the commit, so
+ * make sure we start with the current state.
+ */
+ for_each_intel_crtc_mask(dev, intel_crtc, realloc_pipes) {
+ struct intel_crtc_state *cstate;
+
+ cstate = intel_atomic_get_crtc_state(state, intel_crtc);
+ if (IS_ERR(cstate))
+ return PTR_ERR(cstate);
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int
+skl_compute_wm(struct drm_atomic_state *state)
+{
+ struct drm_crtc *crtc;
+ struct drm_crtc_state *cstate;
+ struct intel_atomic_state *intel_state = to_intel_atomic_state(state);
+ struct skl_ddb_values *results = &intel_state->wm_results;
+ struct skl_pipe_wm *pipe_wm;
+ bool changed = false;
+ int ret, i;
+
/* Clear all dirty flags */
results->dirty_pipes = 0;
+ ret = skl_ddb_add_affected_pipes(state, &changed);
+ if (ret || !changed)
+ return ret;
+
ret = skl_compute_ddb(state);
if (ret)
return ret;
--
2.7.4
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-13 9:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-13 9:51 [PATCH 00/16] Adding NV12 support Vidya Srinivas
2018-02-13 9:51 ` [PATCH 01/16] drm/i915/skl+: rename skl_wm_values struct to skl_ddb_values Vidya Srinivas
2018-02-13 9:52 ` [PATCH 02/16] drm/i915/skl+: refactor WM calculation for NV12 Vidya Srinivas
2018-02-13 9:52 ` [PATCH 03/16] drm/i915/skl+: add NV12 in skl_format_to_fourcc Vidya Srinivas
2018-02-13 10:35 ` Mika Kahola
2018-02-21 3:10 ` Srinivas, Vidya
2018-02-13 9:52 ` [PATCH 04/16] drm/i915/skl+: support verification of DDB HW state for NV12 Vidya Srinivas
2018-02-13 9:52 ` [PATCH 05/16] drm/i915/skl+: NV12 related changes for WM Vidya Srinivas
2018-02-13 9:52 ` [PATCH 06/16] drm/i915/skl+: pass skl_wm_level struct to wm compute func Vidya Srinivas
2018-02-13 9:52 ` [PATCH 07/16] drm/i915/skl+: make sure higher latency level has higher wm value Vidya Srinivas
2018-02-13 9:52 ` [PATCH 08/16] drm/i915/skl+: nv12 workaround disable WM level 1-7 Vidya Srinivas
2018-02-13 9:52 ` Vidya Srinivas [this message]
2018-02-13 9:52 ` [PATCH 10/16] drm/i915: Set scaler mode for NV12 Vidya Srinivas
2018-02-13 9:52 ` [PATCH 11/16] drm/i915: Update format_is_yuv() to include NV12 Vidya Srinivas
2018-02-13 9:52 ` [PATCH 12/16] drm/i915: Upscale scaler max scale for NV12 Vidya Srinivas
2018-02-13 9:52 ` [PATCH 13/16] drm/i915: Add NV12 as supported format for primary plane Vidya Srinivas
2018-02-13 9:52 ` [PATCH 14/16] drm/i915: Add NV12 as supported format for sprite plane Vidya Srinivas
2018-02-13 9:52 ` [PATCH 15/16] drm/i915: Add NV12 support to intel_framebuffer_init Vidya Srinivas
2018-02-13 9:52 ` [PATCH 16/16] drm/i915: Enable YUV to RGB for Gen10 in Plane Ctrl Reg Vidya Srinivas
2018-02-13 10:20 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for Adding NV12 support (rev9) Patchwork
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-02-21 10:20 [PATCH 00/16] Adding NV12 support Vidya Srinivas
2018-02-21 10:20 ` [PATCH 09/16] drm/i915/skl: split skl_compute_ddb function Vidya Srinivas
2018-02-15 2:39 [PATCH 00/16] Adding NV12 support Vidya Srinivas
2018-02-15 2:39 ` [PATCH 09/16] drm/i915/skl: split skl_compute_ddb function Vidya Srinivas
2018-02-14 4:57 [PATCH 00/16] Adding NV12 support Vidya Srinivas
2018-02-14 4:57 ` [PATCH 09/16] drm/i915/skl: split skl_compute_ddb function Vidya Srinivas
2018-02-14 10:02 ` Sharma, Shashank
2018-02-06 13:02 [PATCH 00/16] Adding NV12 support Vidya Srinivas
2018-02-06 13:02 ` [PATCH 09/16] drm/i915/skl: split skl_compute_ddb function Vidya Srinivas
2018-02-06 12:58 [PATCH 00/16] Adding NV12 support Vidya Srinivas
2018-02-06 12:58 ` [PATCH 09/16] drm/i915/skl: split skl_compute_ddb function Vidya Srinivas
2018-01-22 12:03 [PATCH 00/16] Adding NV12 support Vidya Srinivas
2018-01-22 12:03 ` [PATCH 09/16] drm/i915/skl: split skl_compute_ddb function Vidya Srinivas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1518515534-12972-10-git-send-email-vidya.srinivas@intel.com \
--to=vidya.srinivas@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox