intel-gfx.lists.freedesktop.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tomasz Lis <tomasz.lis@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: mika.kuoppala@intel.com
Subject: [PATCH v2] drm/i915/gen11: Preempt-to-idle support in execlists.
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2018 13:44:48 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1524138288-23646-1-git-send-email-tomasz.lis@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1522163879-10837-1-git-send-email-tomasz.lis@intel.com>

The patch adds support of preempt-to-idle requesting by setting a proper
bit within Execlist Control Register, and receiving preemption result from
Context Status Buffer.

Preemption in previous gens required a special batch buffer to be executed,
so the Command Streamer never preempted to idle directly. In Icelake it is
possible, as there is a hardware mechanism to inform the kernel about
status of the preemption request.

This patch does not cover using the new preemption mechanism when GuC is
active.

v2: Added needs_preempt_context() change so that it is not created when
    preempt-to-idle is supported. (Chris)
    Updated setting HWACK flag so that it is cleared after
    preempt-to-dle. (Chris, Daniele)
    Updated to use I915_ENGINE_HAS_PREEMPTION flag. (Chris)

Bspec: 18922
Signed-off-by: Tomasz Lis <tomasz.lis@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h          |  2 ++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c  |  4 ++-
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c          |  3 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h |  1 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c         | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.h         |  1 +
 6 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
index 0286911..f445340 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
@@ -2518,6 +2518,8 @@ intel_info(const struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
 		((dev_priv)->info.has_logical_ring_elsq)
 #define HAS_LOGICAL_RING_PREEMPTION(dev_priv) \
 		((dev_priv)->info.has_logical_ring_preemption)
+#define HAS_HW_PREEMPT_TO_IDLE(dev_priv) \
+		((dev_priv)->info.has_hw_preempt_to_idle)
 
 #define HAS_EXECLISTS(dev_priv) HAS_LOGICAL_RING_CONTEXTS(dev_priv)
 
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c
index 74435af..d65f469 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c
@@ -454,7 +454,9 @@ destroy_kernel_context(struct i915_gem_context **ctxp)
 
 static bool needs_preempt_context(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
 {
-	return HAS_LOGICAL_RING_PREEMPTION(i915);
+	return HAS_LOGICAL_RING_PREEMPTION(i915) &&
+	       !HAS_HW_PREEMPT_TO_IDLE(i915) &&
+	       !USES_GUC_SUBMISSION(i915);
 }
 
 int i915_gem_contexts_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c
index 4364922..66b6700 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c
@@ -595,7 +595,8 @@ static const struct intel_device_info intel_cannonlake_info = {
 	GEN(11), \
 	.ddb_size = 2048, \
 	.has_csr = 0, \
-	.has_logical_ring_elsq = 1
+	.has_logical_ring_elsq = 1, \
+	.has_hw_preempt_to_idle = 1
 
 static const struct intel_device_info intel_icelake_11_info = {
 	GEN11_FEATURES,
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h
index 933e316..4eb97b5 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h
@@ -98,6 +98,7 @@ enum intel_platform {
 	func(has_logical_ring_contexts); \
 	func(has_logical_ring_elsq); \
 	func(has_logical_ring_preemption); \
+	func(has_hw_preempt_to_idle); \
 	func(has_overlay); \
 	func(has_pooled_eu); \
 	func(has_psr); \
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
index 029901a..4c94488 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
@@ -154,6 +154,7 @@
 #define GEN8_CTX_STATUS_ACTIVE_IDLE	(1 << 3)
 #define GEN8_CTX_STATUS_COMPLETE	(1 << 4)
 #define GEN8_CTX_STATUS_LITE_RESTORE	(1 << 15)
+#define GEN11_CTX_STATUS_PREEMPT_IDLE	(1 << 29)
 
 #define GEN8_CTX_STATUS_COMPLETED_MASK \
 	 (GEN8_CTX_STATUS_COMPLETE | GEN8_CTX_STATUS_PREEMPTED)
@@ -552,6 +553,25 @@ static void inject_preempt_context(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
 	execlists_set_active(&engine->execlists, EXECLISTS_ACTIVE_PREEMPT);
 }
 
+static void gen11_preempt_to_idle(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
+{
+	struct intel_engine_execlists *execlists = &engine->execlists;
+
+	GEM_TRACE("%s\n", engine->name);
+
+	/*
+	 * hardware which HAS_HW_PREEMPT_TO_IDLE(), always also
+	 * HAS_LOGICAL_RING_ELSQ(), so we can assume ctrl_reg is set
+	 */
+	GEM_BUG_ON(execlists->ctrl_reg == NULL);
+
+	/* trigger preemption to idle */
+	writel(EL_CTRL_PREEMPT_TO_IDLE, execlists->ctrl_reg);
+
+	execlists_clear_active(execlists, EXECLISTS_ACTIVE_HWACK);
+	execlists_set_active(execlists, EXECLISTS_ACTIVE_PREEMPT);
+}
+
 static void execlists_dequeue(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
 {
 	struct intel_engine_execlists * const execlists = &engine->execlists;
@@ -611,7 +631,10 @@ static void execlists_dequeue(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
 			goto unlock;
 
 		if (need_preempt(engine, last, execlists->queue_priority)) {
-			inject_preempt_context(engine);
+			if (HAS_HW_PREEMPT_TO_IDLE(engine->i915))
+				gen11_preempt_to_idle(engine);
+			else
+				inject_preempt_context(engine);
 			goto unlock;
 		}
 
@@ -1010,7 +1033,15 @@ static void execlists_submission_tasklet(unsigned long data)
 				      GEN8_CTX_STATUS_PREEMPTED))
 				execlists_set_active(execlists,
 						     EXECLISTS_ACTIVE_HWACK);
-			if (status & GEN8_CTX_STATUS_ACTIVE_IDLE)
+
+			/*
+			 * Check if switched to idle or preempted to idle.
+			 * The STATUS_IDLE_ACTIVE flag is really used to mark
+			 * preemtion from idle to idle, this is not a mistake.
+			 */
+			if ((status & GEN8_CTX_STATUS_ACTIVE_IDLE) ||
+			    ((status & GEN8_CTX_STATUS_IDLE_ACTIVE) &&
+			     (status & GEN11_CTX_STATUS_PREEMPT_IDLE)))
 				execlists_clear_active(execlists,
 						       EXECLISTS_ACTIVE_HWACK);
 
@@ -1020,8 +1051,13 @@ static void execlists_submission_tasklet(unsigned long data)
 			/* We should never get a COMPLETED | IDLE_ACTIVE! */
 			GEM_BUG_ON(status & GEN8_CTX_STATUS_IDLE_ACTIVE);
 
-			if (status & GEN8_CTX_STATUS_COMPLETE &&
-			    buf[2*head + 1] == execlists->preempt_complete_status) {
+			/*
+			 * Check if preempted to real idle, either directly or
+			 * the preemptive context already finished executing
+			 */
+			if ((status & GEN11_CTX_STATUS_PREEMPT_IDLE) ||
+			    (status & GEN8_CTX_STATUS_COMPLETE &&
+			    buf[2*head + 1] == execlists->preempt_complete_status)) {
 				GEM_TRACE("%s preempt-idle\n", engine->name);
 
 				execlists_cancel_port_requests(execlists);
@@ -2157,7 +2193,8 @@ static void execlists_set_default_submission(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
 	engine->unpark = NULL;
 
 	engine->flags |= I915_ENGINE_SUPPORTS_STATS;
-	if (engine->i915->preempt_context)
+	if (engine->i915->preempt_context ||
+	    HAS_HW_PREEMPT_TO_IDLE(engine->i915))
 		engine->flags |= I915_ENGINE_HAS_PREEMPTION;
 
 	engine->i915->caps.scheduler =
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.h
index 59d7b86..958d1b3 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.h
@@ -45,6 +45,7 @@
 #define RING_EXECLIST_SQ_CONTENTS(engine)	_MMIO((engine)->mmio_base + 0x510)
 #define RING_EXECLIST_CONTROL(engine)		_MMIO((engine)->mmio_base + 0x550)
 #define	  EL_CTRL_LOAD				(1 << 0)
+#define	  EL_CTRL_PREEMPT_TO_IDLE		(1 << 1)
 
 /* The docs specify that the write pointer wraps around after 5h, "After status
  * is written out to the last available status QW at offset 5h, this pointer
-- 
2.7.4

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-04-19 11:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 70+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-03-27 15:17 [PATCH v1] drm/i915/gen11: Preempt-to-idle support in execlists Tomasz Lis
2018-03-27 15:40 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for " Patchwork
2018-03-27 15:56 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2018-03-27 20:50 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2018-03-27 23:27 ` [PATCH v1] " Chris Wilson
2018-03-28 16:06   ` Lis, Tomasz
2018-03-28 22:28     ` Chris Wilson
2018-03-30 15:42       ` Lis, Tomasz
2018-03-30 19:45         ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2018-04-26 14:02           ` Lis, Tomasz
2018-03-30 18:23   ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2018-04-12 17:15     ` Lis, Tomasz
2018-04-19 11:44 ` Tomasz Lis [this message]
2018-04-19 12:00   ` [PATCH v2] " Chris Wilson
2018-04-19 22:23     ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2018-04-19 11:58 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/gen11: Preempt-to-idle support in execlists. (rev2) Patchwork
2018-04-19 11:59 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2018-04-19 12:13 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2018-04-19 16:08 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2018-05-11 15:45 ` [PATCH v3] drm/i915/gen11: Preempt-to-idle support in execlists - v3 notes Tomasz Lis
2018-05-11 15:45   ` [PATCH v3] drm/i915/gen11: Preempt-to-idle support in execlists Tomasz Lis
2018-05-18 21:08     ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2018-05-21 10:16       ` Lis, Tomasz
2018-05-22 14:39         ` Ceraolo Spurio, Daniele
2018-05-22 14:54           ` Lis, Tomasz
2018-05-11 16:15 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/gen11: Preempt-to-idle support in execlists. (rev3) Patchwork
2018-05-11 16:16 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2018-05-11 16:33 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2018-05-11 17:46 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2018-05-25 18:26 ` [PATCH v4] drm/i915/gen11: Preempt-to-idle support in execlists Tomasz Lis
2018-06-11 16:37   ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2018-06-29 16:50     ` Lis, Tomasz
2018-07-02 17:36       ` Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
2018-05-25 18:51 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/gen11: Preempt-to-idle support in execlists. (rev4) Patchwork
2018-05-25 18:52 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2018-05-25 19:08 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2018-05-26  5:18 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2018-07-06 15:52 ` [PATCH v5] drm/i915/gen11: Preempt-to-idle support in execlists Tomasz Lis
2018-07-06 16:08 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/gen11: Preempt-to-idle support in execlists. (rev5) Patchwork
2018-07-06 16:08 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2018-07-06 16:25 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2018-07-07 14:09 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2018-07-16 13:07 ` [PATCH v6] drm/i915: Add IOCTL Param to control data port coherency Tomasz Lis
2018-07-16 13:35   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-07-18 13:24   ` Joonas Lahtinen
2018-07-18 14:42     ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-07-18 15:28       ` Lis, Tomasz
2018-07-19  7:12         ` Joonas Lahtinen
2018-07-19 15:10           ` Lis, Tomasz
2018-07-16 14:36 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/gen11: Preempt-to-idle support in execlists. (rev6) Patchwork
2018-07-16 14:37 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2018-07-16 14:58 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2018-07-16 19:26 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2018-10-15 17:29 ` [PATCH v5] drm/i915/icl: Preempt-to-idle support in execlists Tomasz Lis
2018-10-16 10:53   ` Joonas Lahtinen
2018-10-19 16:00     ` Lis, Tomasz
2018-10-23  9:13       ` Joonas Lahtinen
2018-10-23  9:24         ` Lis, Tomasz
2018-10-15 17:44 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/gen11: Preempt-to-idle support in execlists. (rev7) Patchwork
2018-10-15 17:45 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2018-10-15 18:07 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2018-10-15 23:55 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2018-11-09 17:18 ` [PATCH v6] drm/i915/icl: Preempt-to-idle support in execlists Tomasz Lis
2018-12-10 15:40   ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2018-12-14 11:10     ` Joonas Lahtinen
2018-12-17 15:21       ` Lis, Tomasz
2018-11-09 18:17 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915/gen11: Preempt-to-idle support in execlists. (rev8) Patchwork
2018-11-09 18:18 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2018-11-09 18:33 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2018-11-10  3:29 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1524138288-23646-1-git-send-email-tomasz.lis@intel.com \
    --to=tomasz.lis@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=mika.kuoppala@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).