From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kenneth Graunke Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] RFC: libdrm: Support Iris Graphics 540 & 550 (Skylake GT3e) Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2016 18:05:11 -0700 Message-ID: <1657484.Me4DBK0g4j@eiger> References: <43a15a30-5a5a-07cf-2bc2-504798af0728@leemhuis.info> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1987062216==" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <43a15a30-5a5a-07cf-2bc2-504798af0728@leemhuis.info> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "dri-devel" To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: Emil Velikov , Thorsten Leemhuis , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Ben Widawsky List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org --===============1987062216== Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1812328.ZoEQixneZ1"; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" --nextPart1812328.ZoEQixneZ1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Wednesday, April 27, 2016 9:37:07 AM PDT Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > Thorsten Leemhuis wrote on 26.04.2016 13:41: > > Lo! Below patch adds the PCI-ID for the Intel(R) Iris Graphics 550=20 (Skylake > > GT3e mobile) to libdrm. It afaics is the last piece that is missing to > > make those GPUs work properly, as Linux 4.6-rc(=C2=B9) and Mesa 11.2 al= ready > > support it =E2=80=93 but without this patch I get a "error initializing= buffer > > manager" message from i965 when it tries to load. I tested it on a > > laptop with a Core i5-6267U and it seems to work -- but I only did a > > few quick tests so far. >=20 > Forget that patch -- a way better one was submitted weeks ago my Michal > already: > https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2016-February/087819.html >=20 > Did that patch simply fall through the cracks or is there a reason why > it wasn't applied to libdrm master? It is pretty obvious it would fix > the problem I saw and tried to address with that rough patch I send > yesterday. >=20 > CU, knurd >=20 > P.S.: Added intel-gfx and michal.winiarski to CC It looks like it fell through the cracks. Roland just mentioned this on IRC...I've reviewed and pushed the patch to master. I'm also making a release. --nextPart1812328.ZoEQixneZ1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAABCAAGBQJXIWHHAAoJEFtb2gcdScw4CEAP/AjVVO7IrKp1lXscrvYY7Ayh mDs9fNXV5UAer3ROiKlr+L4SaN1YEAMPCD/VdSwc2/ENg78KYgNUL4eR4ZQv2Frv 8k64ipHRug/O2aYVIQINx49+pytoxJmhUiKronYbMsTgq4nb6lRMWJ98u6u/J9DV 9+MxTImYE1u2cPm5n2lYwPCpw45sln2WNnf0LZusfGwae9SvD/n6Xg6BQejiemvQ b7IjQGd22c8eWXWI3bZhdf0SmEis8psGqL7Y9QkHoBJ8qsstlnRH0nuWFkikOnuX omboq7w6zh7bt0OnU2PtHZ5kPbW/areikUcTRcoWDbfKkfLD/K2BrJiz7jmuizDC Orf1Ymh0C48HvBILPeuby1KCC17xGYCn3ufpgKUBqaSrT2MbXR01+sxj1cJFxKzi u+kzR3XSN/SaeoLRfG3qJ/1ha0ORL86ey26ArPJAG+z0PR4W+QqDLL83JxjiY55f vIgwWScd66E/dDXnf3gLEZR5x2ZPhcvql7URdi5Mz7IgNtzVj4TRyKtzAX+ziZjs VVCFQ2gcX8LVIGfOszY4Apif+CkpE/iBtsx45D4OAKQkHrYS4Hy5JNXMGWHRTxJR yse2C6I60NMOMSl5hkNEzFODQSF6gtpymD5dTeb8QeVcgYj56oowQwZgJJWyvoOD fyKB1yRUrCMie98VMKlD =lZ23 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1812328.ZoEQixneZ1-- --===============1987062216== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18KZHJpLWRldmVs IG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdApkcmktZGV2ZWxAbGlzdHMuZnJlZWRlc2t0b3Aub3JnCmh0dHBzOi8vbGlz dHMuZnJlZWRlc2t0b3Aub3JnL21haWxtYW4vbGlzdGluZm8vZHJpLWRldmVsCg== --===============1987062216==--