From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>,
Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
DRI Development <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/26] drm/rcar-du: Use for_each_*_in_state
Date: Mon, 30 May 2016 12:18:02 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1849756.ILiGdMgmec@avalon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1464546923-13439-5-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Hi Daniel,
Thank you for the patch.
This looks good to me as the resulting code is mostly similar. However, the
for_each_*_in_state macros end with an for_each_if() that tests if the
object's state is NULL, which isn't present in this code. I'm wondering
whether that was an oversight on my side possibly leading to a crash when
dereferencing a NULL state, or an unneeded check in the macros. Can
atomic_state->*_states[i] be NULL if atomic_state->*[i] is not NULL ?
On Sunday 29 May 2016 20:35:01 Daniel Vetter wrote:
> We want to hide drm_atomic_state internals better.
>
> Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_kms.c | 8 ++++----
> drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_plane.c | 20 ++++++++------------
> 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_kms.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_kms.c index e70a4f33d970..f315c55c1f65
> 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_kms.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_kms.c
> @@ -288,6 +288,8 @@ static int rcar_du_atomic_commit(struct drm_device *dev,
> {
> struct rcar_du_device *rcdu = dev->dev_private;
> struct rcar_du_commit *commit;
> + struct drm_crtc *crtc;
> + struct drm_crtc_state *crtc_state;
> unsigned int i;
> int ret;
>
> @@ -309,10 +311,8 @@ static int rcar_du_atomic_commit(struct drm_device
> *dev, /* Wait until all affected CRTCs have completed previous commits and
> * mark them as pending.
> */
> - for (i = 0; i < dev->mode_config.num_crtc; ++i) {
> - if (state->crtcs[i])
> - commit->crtcs |= 1 << drm_crtc_index(state->crtcs[i]);
> - }
> + for_each_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, crtc_state, i)
> + commit->crtcs |= 1 << drm_crtc_index(crtc);
>
> spin_lock(&rcdu->commit.wait.lock);
> ret = wait_event_interruptible_locked(rcdu->commit.wait,
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_plane.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_plane.c index d445e67f78e1..bfe31ca870cc
> 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_plane.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_plane.c
> @@ -140,18 +140,17 @@ int rcar_du_atomic_check_planes(struct drm_device
> *dev, bool needs_realloc = false;
> unsigned int groups = 0;
> unsigned int i;
> + struct drm_plane *drm_plane;
> + struct drm_plane_state *drm_plane_state;
>
> /* Check if hardware planes need to be reallocated. */
> - for (i = 0; i < dev->mode_config.num_total_plane; ++i) {
> + for_each_plane_in_state(state, drm_plane, drm_plane_state, i) {
> struct rcar_du_plane_state *plane_state;
> struct rcar_du_plane *plane;
> unsigned int index;
>
> - if (!state->planes[i])
> - continue;
> -
> - plane = to_rcar_plane(state->planes[i]);
> - plane_state = to_rcar_plane_state(state->plane_states[i]);
> + plane = to_rcar_plane(drm_plane);
> + plane_state = to_rcar_plane_state(drm_plane_state);
>
> dev_dbg(rcdu->dev, "%s: checking plane (%u,%tu)\n", __func__,
> plane->group->index, plane - plane->group->planes);
> @@ -247,18 +246,15 @@ int rcar_du_atomic_check_planes(struct drm_device
> *dev, }
>
> /* Reallocate hardware planes for each plane that needs it. */
> - for (i = 0; i < dev->mode_config.num_total_plane; ++i) {
> + for_each_plane_in_state(state, drm_plane, drm_plane_state, i) {
> struct rcar_du_plane_state *plane_state;
> struct rcar_du_plane *plane;
> unsigned int crtc_planes;
> unsigned int free;
> int idx;
>
> - if (!state->planes[i])
> - continue;
> -
> - plane = to_rcar_plane(state->planes[i]);
> - plane_state = to_rcar_plane_state(state->plane_states[i]);
> + plane = to_rcar_plane(drm_plane);
> + plane_state = to_rcar_plane_state(drm_plane_state);
>
> dev_dbg(rcdu->dev, "%s: allocating plane (%u,%tu)\n", __func__,
> plane->group->index, plane - plane->group->planes);
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-30 9:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 69+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-29 18:34 [PATCH 00/26] RFC: generic nonblocking support in the atomic helpers Daniel Vetter
2016-05-29 18:34 ` [PATCH 01/26] drm/atomic-helper: use for_each_*_in_state more Daniel Vetter
2016-05-30 12:17 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2016-05-30 15:02 ` Daniel Vetter
2016-05-29 18:34 ` [PATCH 02/26] drm/i915: Use drm_atomic_get_existing_plane_state Daniel Vetter
2016-05-30 13:10 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst
2016-05-29 18:35 ` [PATCH 03/26] drm/msm: Use for_each_*_in_state Daniel Vetter
2016-05-29 18:35 ` [PATCH 04/26] drm/rcar-du: " Daniel Vetter
2016-05-30 9:18 ` Laurent Pinchart [this message]
2016-05-30 9:58 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2016-05-30 14:54 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2016-06-02 22:54 ` Laurent Pinchart
2016-06-03 6:55 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2016-06-03 9:40 ` Laurent Pinchart
2016-06-03 9:45 ` Daniel Vetter
2016-06-03 9:50 ` Laurent Pinchart
2016-05-29 18:35 ` [PATCH 05/26] drm/vc4: Use for_each_plane_in_state Daniel Vetter
2016-05-29 18:35 ` [PATCH 06/26] drm/atomic: Add __drm_atomic_get_current_plane_state Daniel Vetter
2016-05-30 11:42 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst
2016-05-30 15:05 ` Daniel Vetter
2016-05-31 8:35 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst
2016-05-29 18:35 ` [PATCH 07/26] drm/exynos: Use for_each_crtc_in_state Daniel Vetter
2016-05-31 12:19 ` Inki Dae
2016-06-13 0:52 ` Inki Dae
2016-05-29 18:35 ` [PATCH 08/26] drm: Consolidate connector arrays in drm_atomic_state Daniel Vetter
2016-05-30 14:59 ` Ville Syrjälä
2016-05-30 15:13 ` Daniel Vetter
2016-05-30 15:25 ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjälä
2016-05-30 15:33 ` Daniel Vetter
2016-05-30 15:45 ` Ville Syrjälä
2016-05-30 15:48 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2016-05-29 18:35 ` [PATCH 09/26] drm: Consolidate plane " Daniel Vetter
2016-05-29 18:35 ` [PATCH 10/26] drm: Consolidate crtc " Daniel Vetter
2016-05-29 18:35 ` [PATCH 11/26] drm/fence: add fence to drm_pending_event Daniel Vetter
2016-05-29 18:35 ` [PATCH 12/26] drm/atomic-helper: Massage swap_state signature somewhat Daniel Vetter
2016-05-30 13:08 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2016-05-30 15:09 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2016-05-31 8:43 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2016-05-31 10:46 ` Daniel Vetter
2016-05-31 12:20 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2016-05-29 18:35 ` [PATCH 13/26] drm/arc: Nuke event_list Daniel Vetter
2016-05-29 18:35 ` [PATCH 14/26] drm/arc: Actually bother with handling atomic events Daniel Vetter
2016-05-29 18:35 ` [PATCH 15/26] drm/arc: Implement nonblocking commit correctly Daniel Vetter
2016-05-30 8:15 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst
2016-05-30 9:24 ` Daniel Vetter
2016-05-30 9:36 ` Maarten Lankhorst
2016-05-30 15:10 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2016-05-29 18:35 ` [PATCH 16/26] drm/hdlcd: Use helper support for nonblocking commits Daniel Vetter
2016-05-31 11:02 ` Liviu Dudau
2016-05-31 11:07 ` Daniel Vetter
2016-05-31 13:13 ` Liviu Dudau
2016-05-29 18:35 ` [PATCH 17/26] drm/fsl-du: Implement some semblance of vblank event handling Daniel Vetter
2016-05-29 18:35 ` [PATCH 18/26] drm/hisilicon: " Daniel Vetter
2016-05-29 18:35 ` [PATCH 19/26] drm/sun4i: " Daniel Vetter
2016-06-01 16:18 ` Maxime Ripard
2016-06-01 22:02 ` Daniel Vetter
2016-05-29 18:35 ` [PATCH 20/26] drm/atomic: kerneldoc for drm_atomic_crtc_needs_modeset Daniel Vetter
2016-05-29 18:35 ` [PATCH 21/26] drm/atomic-helper: nonblocking commit support Daniel Vetter
2016-05-30 8:01 ` [PATCH] " Daniel Vetter
2016-05-31 14:22 ` [Intel-gfx] " Maarten Lankhorst
2016-05-31 14:33 ` Daniel Vetter
2016-05-29 18:35 ` [PATCH 22/26] drm/i915: Signal drm events for atomic Daniel Vetter
2016-05-29 18:35 ` [PATCH 23/26] drm/i915: Roll out the helper nonblock tracking Daniel Vetter
2016-05-29 18:35 ` [PATCH 24/26] drm/rockchip: convert to helper nonblocking atomic commit Daniel Vetter
2016-05-29 18:35 ` [PATCH 25/26] drm/rockchip: Nuke pending event handling in preclose Daniel Vetter
2016-05-29 18:35 ` [PATCH 26/26] drm/virtio: Don't reinvent a flipping wheel Daniel Vetter
2016-05-31 13:40 ` ✗ Ro.CI.BAT: failure for RFC: generic nonblocking support in the atomic helpers Patchwork
2016-05-31 13:42 ` Patchwork
2016-05-31 14:29 ` Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1849756.ILiGdMgmec@avalon \
--to=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=daniel.vetter@intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox