From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Paolo Ornati <ornati@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] Interrupt latency on some 945GM platforms
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2010 20:21:12 +0200
Message-ID: <20100923202112.7efa65a7@gmail.com>
References: <201009132336.17310.anarsoul@gmail.com>
	<201009171002.09187.simon.farnsworth@onelan.co.uk>
	<4b4d1e0a-b1ad-40f1-a829-6d4726d2b2d3@email.android.com>
	<201009171550.48480.anarsoul@gmail.com>
	<20100921202607.2b46ffca@gmail.com>
	<20100921155653.440afea4@jbarnes-desktop>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20100921155653.440afea4@jbarnes-desktop>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Cc: Vasily Khoruzhick <anarsoul@gmail.com>, Simon Farnsworth <simon.farnsworth@onelan.co.uk>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Sitsofe Wheeler <sitsofe@yahoo.com>, Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@google.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org

On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 15:56:53 -0700
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> wrote:

> Can you guys try something like this?  My theory is that 945GM has some
> power management behavior we're failing to configure correctly.  If
> disabling it works, then it's likely related.

"processor.max_cstate=1" solves the problem too, tomorrow (it takes time
to be sure the problem is gone) I'll run with "processor.max_cstate=2"
and then I'll try with the patch alone.

-- 
	Paolo Ornati
	Linux 2.6.35.4 on x86_64