Re: Interrupt latency on some 945GM platforms

Vasily Khoruzhick
2010-09-14T08:10:41Z

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: Text/Plain, Size: 1065 bytes --]

В сообщении от 14 of September 2010 03:55:32 автор Venkatesh Pallipadi
написал:

> Whats the clockevent in this case ("Tick Device" section of
> /proc/timer_list). clocksource= option only changes the clocksource used
> to maintain
> timeofday. But, timer interrupt (clockevent) source will not change.
> Wondering how just the clocksource change is making the diff here..
>
> Also, if clocksource tsc has a higher rating than HPET. The reason
> HPET is getting used as clocksource in the first place seems to be due
> to TSC is not a dependable clocksource on this platform (may be it
> stops in C3). So, I am not sure forcing it to tsc will be a good
> thing. May be clocksource=acpi_pm is a better thing to try.
>
> Thanks,
> Venki

I investigated it a bit and found out that single nohz=off option helps. Just
changing clocksource doesn't help, but it works smoothly with any clocksource
with nohz=off. So, it seems that something wrong with intel driver while
system is in tickless mode.

Regards
Vasily

[-- Attachment #1.2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 159 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org