From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Florian Mickler Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/2] drm: record monitor status in output_poll_execute Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 17:34:24 +0100 Message-ID: <20101208173424.76ec4041@schatten.dmk.lab> References: <1290797159-3977-1-git-send-email-keithp@keithp.com> <1290797159-3977-2-git-send-email-keithp@keithp.com> <20101205132743.3b3458ab@schatten.dmk.lab> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Keith Packard Cc: Chris Wilson , Dave Airlie , intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org On Sun, 05 Dec 2010 13:08:18 -0800 Keith Packard wrote: > On Sun, 5 Dec 2010 13:27:43 +0100, Florian Mickler wrote: > > On Fri, 26 Nov 2010 10:45:59 -0800 > > Keith Packard wrote: > > > > > In order to correctly report monitor connected status changes, the > > > previous monitor status must be recorded in the connector->status > > > value instead of being discarded. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Keith Packard > > > > Keith, am I right to assume that these address > > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22672 > > and probably: > > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23472 > > Yes, this is part of the patch for that. The other piece is in the 2D > driver which has a matching bug. That patch is already on master. > Does that mean that the kernel regression will not be fixed/worked-around for old userspace? Regards, Flo