From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Garrett Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] ACPI: Tie ACPI backlight devices to PCI devices if possible Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2011 23:05:58 +0000 Message-ID: <20110206230558.GA23889@srcf.ucam.org> References: <1295033065-13450-1-git-send-email-mjg@redhat.com> <201102062341.19631.rjw@sisk.pl> <20110206225308.GA23557@srcf.ucam.org> <201102070001.25814.rjw@sisk.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201102070001.25814.rjw@sisk.pl> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: dri-devel-bounces+sf-dri-devel=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org Errors-To: dri-devel-bounces+sf-dri-devel=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, rpurdie@rpsys.net, akpm@linux-foundation.org List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 12:01:25AM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > Yes, it seems so, but I'm not sure what the short term consequences of that > change will be. Perhaps there will be none. :-) Ok, I'll have a play with that. Maybe we should be fixing this up somehow in the acpi-pci glue code? It seems wrong to have acpi devices resumed before the PCI device they're associated with. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org