From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Florian Mickler <florian@mickler.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Re-enable rc6 w/fix
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 22:32:09 +0100
Message-ID: <20110315223209.52cc27cc@schatten.dmk.lab>
References: <1300164901-4937-1-git-send-email-ben@bwidawsk.net>
	<1bdc18$jsdqub@fmsmga002.fm.intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org>
Received: from mx01.d-labs.de (ist.d-labs.de [213.239.218.44])
	by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 482879E8BB
	for <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>;
	Tue, 15 Mar 2011 14:37:20 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <1bdc18$jsdqub@fmsmga002.fm.intel.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/options/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx>
List-Post: <mailto:intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
List-Help: <mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org

On Tue, 15 Mar 2011 07:59:48 +0000
Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote:

> > Resolve https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28582
> 
> I understood the convention (to aide those running external scripts) was
> either Bugzilla: or References:

Thx for considering those poor souls that try to follow up on all
those loose ends.... But here it actually doesn't matter all that much,
the 'https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=' - prefix to the
bug number is enough of a give-away to parse the changelog for. 

Still, I expect there are people who like consistency and so, from my
experience of changelog digging you are indeed correct, that
References: or Bugzilla: seems to be prevalent.

Regards,
Flo