From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: John Harrigan <jfharrigan@fedex.com>
Subject: Re: slow graphics after Suspend to RAM
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 09:32:39 -0600
Message-ID: <20110317153239.GA6274@2530p.rmtc.fedex.com>
References: <20110316235920.GA392@ink.rmtc.fedex.com>
	<1bdc18$jt7ta9@fmsmga002.fm.intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org>
Received: from mx18.infosec.fedex.com (mx18.infosec.fedex.com [199.81.216.54])
	by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29EED9E738
	for <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>;
	Thu, 17 Mar 2011 08:32:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from netsvr20.prod.fedex.com (netsvr20.prod.fedex.com
	[199.81.10.128])
	by inet04.prod.fedex.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id p2HFWFW6029389
	for <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>;
	Thu, 17 Mar 2011 10:32:15 -0500 (CDT)
Content-disposition: inline
Received: from localhost ([199.82.94.58]) by emmsvr20.prod.fedex.com
	(Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-8.01 (built Dec 16 2008;
	32bit)) with ESMTP id <0LI700BEQKHQC810@emmsvr20.prod.fedex.com> for
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 10:32:15 -0500 (CDT)
In-reply-to: <1bdc18$jt7ta9@fmsmga002.fm.intel.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/options/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx>
List-Post: <mailto:intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
List-Help: <mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org

* chris@chris-wilson.co.uk (Mar 17, 2011 @ 07:51+0000):
> On Wed, 16 Mar 2011 17:59:20 -0600, John Harrigan <jfharrigan@fedex.com> wrote:
> > I have a Lenovo X201 laptop with an i7-620M processor.  After I resume
> > from a Suspend to RAM the graphics are very slow.  Suspend to Disk does
> > not cause the same problem and doing a Suspend to Disk after a Suspend
> > to RAM fixes the problem.
> 
> Known problem. The PAT lose the WC bits for the GTT aperture on resume.
> There is a workaround that we can do: recreate the ioremapping upon
> resume. (But the root cause is not a gfx driver bug.)

Thanks.  Is there an existing bug report somewhere where I should
supply logs and debug info?