From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ted Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/24] MacBook Air patch sequence (v2)
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 09:20:55 -0400
Message-ID: <20110930132055.GB3616@thunk.org>
References: <20110923085243.6e4b7b4c@jbarnes-x220>
 <1317344993-24945-1-git-send-email-keithp@keithp.com>
 <20110930033356.GA11621@kroah.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20110930033356.GA11621@kroah.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Cc: Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>, Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org

On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 08:33:56PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> I'm all for enabling new hardware like this, and overall, the patches
> aren't that bad, just want to verify this.
> 
> And, I do have to tell you, "curses, now I have no excuse to not buy
> that laptop!"

What kind of battery life do you get with these patches applied, out
of curiosity?

Darn it, I have a Macbook Air, but I use it for media consumption
purposes.  This would be a great temption to get a second one as a
Linux box...

						- Ted