From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Vetter Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/21] drm/i915: Only use VBT panel mode on eDP if no EDID is found Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 18:32:35 +0200 Message-ID: <20110930163235.GD2859@phenom.ffwll.local> References: <20110923085243.6e4b7b4c@jbarnes-x220> <1317344993-24945-1-git-send-email-keithp@keithp.com> <1317344993-24945-5-git-send-email-keithp@keithp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1317344993-24945-5-git-send-email-keithp@keithp.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org To: Keith Packard Cc: Dave Airlie , intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 06:09:36PM -0700, Keith Packard wrote: > We're going to assume that EDID is more reliable than the VBT tables > for eDP panels, which is notably true on MacBook machines where the > VBT contains completely bogus data. > > Signed-off-by: Keith Packard Ok, this is way over my head, just checked whether the patch does what it claims to - nice exercise in reading dp modeset code ;-) Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter -- Daniel Vetter Mail: daniel@ffwll.ch Mobile: +41 (0)79 365 57 48