From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] drm/i915: Rename PIPE_CONTROL bit
 defines to be less terse.
Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2011 12:26:19 -0700
Message-ID: <20111015122619.0e5c0380@bwidawsk.net>
References: <1318369270-1568-1-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
	<1318369270-1568-2-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
	<20111011165116.537f0708@bwidawsk.net>
	<20111015140117.GB2819@phenom.ffwll.local>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org>
Received: from cloud01.chad-versace.us (184-106-247-128.static.cloud-ips.com
	[184.106.247.128])
	by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B30209E74E
	for <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>;
	Sat, 15 Oct 2011 12:26:22 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20111015140117.GB2819@phenom.ffwll.local>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/options/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx>
List-Post: <mailto:intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
List-Help: <mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>, intel-gfx <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org

On Sat, 15 Oct 2011 16:01:17 +0200
Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> wrote:

> On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 04:51:16PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> > I thought we all agreed that "PIPE_CONTROL_WRITE_FLUSH" doesn't make
> > sense for Gen6? Or was that just me agreeing with myself?
> 
> I couldn't find any comment of yours to that effect ... :p You'd be much
> happier if I add a RENDER_CACHE_FLUSH for gen6+?
> 
> Cheers, Daniel

I really want to make these things match the docs as closely as
possible. Especially PIPE_CONTROL which I know I will refer to over and
over. Like I said, r-b from me either way, but if you redo the series
anyway for some reason, I would prefer that.

Ben