From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Vetter Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: only match on PCI_BASE_CLASS_DISPLAY Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2011 12:05:36 +0200 Message-ID: <20111023100536.GB2953@phenom.ffwll.local> References: <1318323545-2786-1-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> <4E944763.3060703@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-ww0-f43.google.com (mail-ww0-f43.google.com [74.125.82.43]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 707019E78B for ; Sun, 23 Oct 2011 03:04:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by wwf10 with SMTP id 10so6174583wwf.12 for ; Sun, 23 Oct 2011 03:04:45 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4E944763.3060703@redhat.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org To: Keith Packard Cc: Daniel Vetter , intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Hi Keith This patch isn't in your -next pull request. Please consider merging for 3.2. Yours, Daniel On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 09:40:51AM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote: > On 10/11/11 4:59 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > >... not DISPLAY_VGA, because we ignore the VGA subclass with our > >class_mask. > > > >It confused me until Chris Wilson clued me up. > > > >Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter > > Reviewed-by: Adam Jackson > > - ajax > -- Daniel Vetter Mail: daniel@ffwll.ch Mobile: +41 (0)79 365 57 48