From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] drm/i915: Ivybridge still has fences!
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2011 12:18:09 +0200
Message-ID: <20111023121809.2b36aaf6@jbarnes-x220>
References: <1318189923-4609-1-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
	<20111010105822.58114c0e@jbarnes-desktop>
	<20111023101200.GC2953@phenom.ffwll.local>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org>
Received: from oproxy3-pub.bluehost.com (oproxy3-pub.bluehost.com [69.89.21.8])
	by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ED1219E7CB
	for <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>;
	Sun, 23 Oct 2011 03:18:13 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20111023101200.GC2953@phenom.ffwll.local>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/options/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx>
List-Post: <mailto:intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
List-Help: <mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, stable@kernel.org
List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org

On Sun, 23 Oct 2011 12:12:00 +0200
Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> wrote:

> On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 10:58:22AM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > On Sun,  9 Oct 2011 21:52:01 +0200
> > Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> wrote:
> > 
> > > So don't forget to restore them on resume and dump them into
> > > the error state.
> > 
> > This should probably just be >= 6 instead; I don't think we're
> > getting rid of fences anytime soon.
> 
> As discussed on irc >= 6 is a bit hard to do in a switch
> statement ;-) Do you want me to resend the patches using the gcc
> ranged switch extension suggested by Adam Jackson (i.e. 6..UINT_MAX)?
> Or can you slap your r-b on them as-is?

I was suggesting that you convert it to an if ladder with the >= 6 at
the top.  That should be a separate patch though.

Jesse