From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Lukas Hejtmanek" Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/i915: re-enable rc6 by default Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 00:23:52 +0100 Message-ID: <20111114232352.GF442@ics.muni.cz> References: <1321303155-12624-1-git-send-email-eugeni.dodonov@intel.com> <1321303155-12624-2-git-send-email-eugeni.dodonov@intel.com> <20111114210654.GG3670@ics.muni.cz> <20111114231202.GE442@ics.muni.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from mail.g-wis.com (www.myfax2email.com [204.250.154.18]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A77E39EB21 for ; Mon, 14 Nov 2011 15:24:10 -0800 (PST) Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org To: Eugeni Dodonov Cc: Daniel Vetter , intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Eugeni Dodonov List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 09:17:39PM -0200, Eugeni Dodonov wrote: > Are the issues SNA-specific, or they happen with UXA as well? > = > I do use both SNA and UXA actually (thanks to > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~eugeni/xf86-video-intel/ :)). I believe they happen with both but with SNA I got regular corruption while with UXA I got accidental corruption. I.e., with SNA I got corrupted window= in few minutes, with UXA maybe one corruption per few hours. But I did not try those Eric's gating patches with UXA. I got also X server segfaults related to XV video (moving window, resing window with video crashes the X server randomly). Didn't investigate this (getting core file, e.g.) I have X server 1.10, I think there are some fixes around 1.12. = -- = Luk=E1=B9 Hejtm=E1nek