From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ali Gholami Rudi Subject: Re: missing acpi backlight bisected to 9661e92c10 Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 12:49:00 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <20112208171010@lilem.mirepesht> References: <4E428421.1000605@fedoraproject.org> <20110810191700.81c3a7ee.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20112108083014@lilem.mirepesht> <20112108160718@lilem.mirepesht> <20110811123929.GA22409@srcf.ucam.org> <20112108181410@lilem.mirepesht> <20110811141630.GA24704@srcf.ucam.org> <20112108185137@lilem.mirepesht> <20112208102524@lilem.mirepesht> <20110812121822.GA11301@srcf.ucam.org> Return-path: Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2011 17:10:10 +0430 In-Reply-To: <20110812121822.GA11301@srcf.ucam.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Matthew Garrett Cc: Andrew Morton , Keith Packard , Michel Alexandre Salim , intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Richard Purdie , Chris Wilson , David Airlie , Alex Deucher , Ben Skeggs , Zhang Rui , Len Brown , Jesse Barnes , Sedat Dilek , Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Matthew Garrett wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 10:25:24AM +0430, Ali Gholami Rudi wrote: > > > Yet, /sys/devices/virtual/backlight/acpi_video0/brightness only > > appears after the revert. Seems something changes its behavior > > if new_bd->dev.parent is not NULL in backlight_device_register(). > > Well, yes, if it has a parent it won't be under /sys/devices/virtual. > Does it appear under /sys/class/backlight ? Yep! Thought this is the 2.6.38-rc1 issue coming back (I really thought I had searched /sys...). Sorry for the noise. Thanks, Ali