From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Vetter Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: sprite init failure on pre-SNB is not a failure Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2012 23:55:18 +0100 Message-ID: <20120113225518.GD3843@phenom.ffwll.local> References: <20120112080844.4682d087@jbarnes-desktop> <20120112085937.30da2174@jbarnes-desktop> <86r4z337nh.fsf@sumi.keithp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-wi0-f177.google.com (mail-wi0-f177.google.com [209.85.212.177]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 192329E93C for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2012 14:53:11 -0800 (PST) Received: by wibhq15 with SMTP id hq15so992075wib.36 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2012 14:53:11 -0800 (PST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <86r4z337nh.fsf@sumi.keithp.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org To: Keith Packard Cc: airlied@linux.ie, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 08:10:42AM -0800, Keith Packard wrote: > On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 08:59:37 -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote: > > > ENODEV actually does tell you why the init failed, in case you want to > > look at the debug logs... > > Daniel -- are you OK with merging this as-is? It seems fine to me. That was just a bit of random bikeshedding and we won't see it anyway as opposed to the overly load DRM_ERROR, i.e. I'm fine as-is. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Mail: daniel@ffwll.ch Mobile: +41 (0)79 365 57 48