Re: [PULL] drm-intel-next

Jani Nikula
2014-05-07T06:38:47Z

On Tue, 06 May 2014, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> wrote:
> On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 10:04:17PM +0200, Knut Petersen wrote:
>> On 06.05.2014 20:59, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> >On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 04:30:45PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> >>On Tue, 06 May 2014, Knut Petersen <Knut_Petersen@t-online.de> wrote:
>> >>>On 28.04.2014 15:26, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> >>>The patch below is a clear candidate for 3.15 as it fixes a regression introduced after 3.14
>> >>>>Egbert Eich (1):
>> >>>> drm/i915/SDVO: For sysfs link put directory and target in correct order
>> >>Daniel, want me to pick that for -fixes?
>> >Yeah I geuss so. People never complained that the link isn't there, us
>> >adding it for one kernel release to the wrong place doesn't really sound
>> >too bothersome.
>> >
>> >But if this unbreaks a system somewhere then it makes sense to apply to
>> >-fixes.
>> >
>> >Knut, how exactly does your system blow up?
>> Well, it's only the warning generated at boot time that would irritate users.
>> As a patch is known and tested it's probably a good idea to fix it before
>> people complain to lkml and bugzilla.
>
> Ah, I didn't realize there's a warning, I've thought only the symlink goes
> the wrong way. In that case it's good to go for -fixes.

Done.

--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center