From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] drm/i915: extract gt interrupt handler
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 21:31:27 -0700
Message-ID: <20120330213127.160c4df0@bwidawsk.net>
References: <1333131875-24458-1-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
	<1333131875-24458-3-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
	<20120330112840.7d6b7721@jbarnes-desktop>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org>
Received: from cloud01.chad-versace.us (184-106-247-128.static.cloud-ips.com
	[184.106.247.128])
	by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CCB79E917
	for <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>;
	Fri, 30 Mar 2012 21:34:19 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20120330112840.7d6b7721@jbarnes-desktop>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/options/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx>
List-Post: <mailto:intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
List-Help: <mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
To: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>, Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org

On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 11:28:40 -0700
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> wrote:

> On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 20:24:35 +0200
> Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> wrote:
> 
> > vlv, ivb and snb all share the gen6+ gt irq handling. 3 copies of
> > the same stuff is a bit much, so extract it into a little helper.
> > 
> > Now ilk has a different gt irq handling than snb, but shares the
> > same irq handler (due to the similar display block). So also
> > extract the ilk gt irq handling to clearly separate these two
> > things.
> > 
> > Nice side effect of this is that we can complete Ben Widawsky's
> > gen6+ irq bit #define cleanup and call the render irq also with the
> > GEN6 alias. Beforehand that code was shared with ilk, and neither
> > option really made much sense.
> > 
> > As a bonus this enables the error interrupt handling lifted from the
> > vlv code on snb and ivb, too.
> > 
> > Signed-Off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
> 
> Nice cleanup.  Though I don't really like the IS_GEN5 branch in
> ironlake_irq_handler... might be nicer to just bite the bullet and
> have a mostly duplicate snb irq handler.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
> 

I agree with Jesse. Bite the bullet, you're already +LOC (see below),
may as well give it a nice clean split.

Personally, I'd like to give you crap about the fact that your
"cleanup" had a +LOC, which came up recently regarding my ILK
context stuff.

Antagonized-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>