From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: enable DOP level clock gating
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 08:56:30 -0700
Message-ID: <20120424085630.4b3b434e@bwidawsk.net>
References: <1335056228-21737-1-git-send-email-ben@bwidawsk.net>
	<20120424140324.GC25770@phenom.ffwll.local>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org>
Received: from cloud01.chad-versace.us (184-106-247-128.static.cloud-ips.com
	[184.106.247.128])
	by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 673FB9EB2A
	for <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>;
	Tue, 24 Apr 2012 08:56:38 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20120424140324.GC25770@phenom.ffwll.local>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/options/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx>
List-Post: <mailto:intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
List-Help: <mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org

On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 16:03:24 +0200
Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> wrote:

> On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 05:57:08PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> > Rebased after new intel_pm split. This needs testing from QA to see how
> > it impacts power consumption.
> > 
> > Cc: "Zhang, Ouping" <ouping.zhang@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
> 
> I've seen the internal power testing results and nothing seems to change.
> And you've mentioned in an earlier version of this that this regresses
> openarena throughput. So I guess I can drop this?
> -Daniel
> 

Let's not "drop" it. Put it on the back burner. I'm following up with
the design engineers, and may run my own tests. There was surprise by
some with the results we got.

Ben