From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] drm/i915: Handle PendingFlip on gen3
 robustly
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 21:58:17 +0200
Message-ID: <20120424195817.GA22820@phenom.ffwll.local>
References: <1335288691-21819-1-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
	<1335288691-21819-5-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
	<20120424125035.6a495e85@jbarnes-desktop>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org>
Received: from mail-we0-f177.google.com (mail-we0-f177.google.com
	[74.125.82.177])
	by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAAED9ED74
	for <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>;
	Tue, 24 Apr 2012 12:57:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by werp11 with SMTP id p11so813230wer.36
	for <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>;
	Tue, 24 Apr 2012 12:57:21 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20120424125035.6a495e85@jbarnes-desktop>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/options/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx>
List-Post: <mailto:intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
List-Help: <mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
To: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org

On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 12:50:35PM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 18:31:30 +0100
> Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote:
> > -		if (dev->primary->master) {
> > -			master_priv = dev->primary->master->driver_priv;
> > -			if (master_priv->sarea_priv)
> > -				master_priv->sarea_priv->last_dispatch =
> > -					READ_BREADCRUMB(dev_priv);
> > -		}
> 
> Separate but worthy patch.  In fact can we get rid of these at all?
> Does anyone still pretend that DRI1 works?

We still have to, so it can't go. But if you want some warm fuzzies from
removing dri1 crap, look no further than my patch-bomb - there's a patch
in there which removes this code for gen5+.
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Mail: daniel@ffwll.ch
Mobile: +41 (0)79 365 57 48