From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: rip out intel_dpio_write again
Date: Thu, 3 May 2012 11:10:36 +0200
Message-ID: <20120503091005.GA4983@phenom.ffwll.local>
References: <1335949584-10507-1-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
	<20120502084427.7f0050c2@bwidawsk.net>
	<20120502115548.0cecafac@jbarnes-desktop>
	<20120502131856.5375aa47@bwidawsk.net>
	<20120502172219.41bd6035@jbarnes-desktop>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org>
Received: from mail-wi0-f177.google.com (mail-wi0-f177.google.com
	[209.85.212.177])
	by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AB799EE9D
	for <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>;
	Thu,  3 May 2012 02:09:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wibhj13 with SMTP id hj13so96313wib.12
	for <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>;
	Thu, 03 May 2012 02:09:30 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20120502172219.41bd6035@jbarnes-desktop>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/options/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx>
List-Post: <mailto:intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
List-Help: <mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
To: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>, Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>, Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org

On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 05:22:19PM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Wed, 2 May 2012 13:18:56 -0700
> Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, 2 May 2012 11:55:48 -0700
> > Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> wrote:
> > 
> > > On Wed, 2 May 2012 08:44:27 -0700
> > > Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > On Wed,  2 May 2012 11:06:23 +0200
> > > > Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > > Unfortunately it looks like further vlv patches are still stalled due
> > > > > to fried hw, and too many people are a bit annoyed about the unused
> > > > > function warning.
> > > > 
> > > > It is my preference that you never merge code which you know will
> > > > produce a warning. I still stand by adding a __used for intermediate
> > > > patches.
> > > 
> > > Well he could have just merged the other patches too, but nooo...
> > > 
> > 
> > Twasn't a shot at you... shot was fired at Daniel (although if you *did*
> > but in __used I wouldn't have had to shoot at Daniel).
> 
> Meh ok you can kill this function.  Vijay will be re-posting the code
> that uses it (and adds it again) once he gets his hardware, unless I
> beat him to it (still waiting on a new CPU).

I guess that counts as an ack ... patch merged for -next.
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Mail: daniel@ffwll.ch
Mobile: +41 (0)79 365 57 48