From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: cache the EDID for eDP panels
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2012 14:26:11 -0700
Message-ID: <20120605142611.02f8eafb@jbarnes-desktop>
References: <1338929667-6814-1-git-send-email-jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
	<1338930190_513452@CP5-2952>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org>
Received: from oproxy5-pub.bluehost.com (oproxy5-pub.bluehost.com
	[67.222.38.55])
	by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3A72A9E955
	for <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>;
	Tue,  5 Jun 2012 14:26:14 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <1338930190_513452@CP5-2952>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/options/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx>
List-Post: <mailto:intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
List-Help: <mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org

On Tue, 05 Jun 2012 22:02:25 +0100
Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote:

> On Tue,  5 Jun 2012 16:54:27 -0400, Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> wrote:
> > They aren't going anywhere, and probing on DDC can cause the panel to
> > blank briefly, so read them up front and cache them for later queries.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
> 
> Maybe we could harmonise more of the common panel tasks between LVDS and
> eDP, and help fight code duplication?

Yeah that makes sense.  Not sure how much this conflicts with Daniel's
hot plug rework either; there's likely some overlap.

-- 
Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center