From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Vetter Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/25] i915 HW context support Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 18:04:57 +0200 Message-ID: <20120614160457.GB4797@phenom.ffwll.local> References: <1338846185-10571-1-git-send-email-ben@bwidawsk.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1338846185-10571-1-git-send-email-ben@bwidawsk.net> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: mesa-dev-bounces+gcvmd-mesa3d-493=gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org Errors-To: mesa-dev-bounces+gcvmd-mesa3d-493=gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org To: Ben Widawsky Cc: Mesa Dev , intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, DRI Devel List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org On Mon, Jun 04, 2012 at 02:42:40PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote: > Setting myself up for a late night crying session once again. Most of the > people reading this probably know the history and reasons for the patches. If > not, you can search the intel-gfx mailing list to try to learn more. I won't > recap the whole thing here, and instead let the patches speak for themselves. > > Instead a brief review of what's here, and what's happened. Mostly, > these badly need testing and review. I've carried these around for so > long now, and seen so many different failures, I'm quite paranoid they > still aren't perfect. Also, I've spent almost all of the time working on > this in the kernel, so there is bound to be simple errors in the other > stuff. > > I've run these on various workloads and saw nothing worth mentioning. Ok, my little attempt at in-situ bikeshedding failed, so I've just slurped in your patches directly and only applied the minimal change to get rid of object->context_id. Please commit the i-g-t testcase so that qa can start testing this aspa. Cheers, Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Mail: daniel@ffwll.ch Mobile: +41 (0)79 365 57 48