From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] drm/i915: add cpu_map to i915 object
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2012 06:56:44 -0700
Message-ID: <20120713065644.20bd5170@bwidawsk.net>
References: <1342160176-1807-1-git-send-email-ben@bwidawsk.net>
	<1342160176-1807-3-git-send-email-ben@bwidawsk.net>
	<1342165645_3225@CP5-2952>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org>
Received: from cloud01.chad-versace.us (184-106-247-128.static.cloud-ips.com
	[184.106.247.128])
	by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 699E59E74E
	for <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>;
	Fri, 13 Jul 2012 06:58:45 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <1342165645_3225@CP5-2952>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/options/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx>
List-Post: <mailto:intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
List-Help: <mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org

On Fri, 13 Jul 2012 08:47:15 +0100
Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote:

> On Thu, 12 Jul 2012 23:16:13 -0700, Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> wrote:
> > mostly for convenience, this will help us clear up a bit of the code in
> > intel_ringbuffer.c
> 
> I don't think your couple of use-cases is a strong enough argument to
> justify an extra pointer on thousands of objects.
> 
> If you wanted, you could make the ilk pc w/a use the status page
> instead...
> -Chris
> 

Actually, my original code went a step further than this. It combined
all the ring data into 1 object, and then used a mini allocator for the
pipe control, ring status, and the few dwords I need. I was _sure_ you
would hate that, so I went to this.

Can you swallow the one object for everything + allocator idea?

-- 
Ben Widawsky, Intel Open Source Technology Center