From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: don't grab dev->struct_mutex for
 userspace forcewak
Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2012 22:23:25 +0200
Message-ID: <20120811202325.GF5132@phenom.ffwll.local>
References: <1344544438-5654-1-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
	<1344637338_72217@CP5-2952>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org>
Received: from mail-we0-f177.google.com (mail-we0-f177.google.com
	[74.125.82.177])
	by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2CA89E7D8
	for <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>;
	Sat, 11 Aug 2012 13:23:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by weyr3 with SMTP id r3so1839668wey.36
	for <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>;
	Sat, 11 Aug 2012 13:23:05 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1344637338_72217@CP5-2952>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/options/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx>
List-Post: <mailto:intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
List-Help: <mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>, Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>, Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org

On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 11:22:15PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Thu,  9 Aug 2012 22:33:58 +0200, Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> wrote:
> > Since forcewake is now protected by a spinlock, we don't need to grab
> > dev->struct_mutex any more. This way we can also get rid of a stale
> > comment, noticed by Ben Widawsky while reviewing some locking changes.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> (Although I still wish it were not so)
Queued for -next, thanks for the review.
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Mail: daniel@ffwll.ch
Mobile: +41 (0)79 365 57 48