From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ben Widawsky Subject: Re: [PATCH] intel: properly test for HAS_LLC Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2012 23:22:19 -0700 Message-ID: <20120907232219.3ff27f5f@bwidawsk.net> References: <1346404733-25372-1-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from shiva.chad-versace.us (209-20-75-48.static.cloud-ips.com [209.20.75.48]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68A519E861 for ; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 23:22:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1346404733-25372-1-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org To: Daniel Vetter Cc: Intel Graphics Development List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org On Fri, 31 Aug 2012 11:18:53 +0200 Daniel Vetter wrote: > If the kernel supports the test, we need to check the param. > Copy&pasta from the above checks that only look at the return value. > Interesting how much one can get such a simple interface wrong. > > Issue created in > > commit 151cdcfe685ee280a4344dfc40e6087d74a5590f > Author: Eugeni Dodonov > Date: Tue Jan 17 15:20:19 2012 -0200 > > intel: query for LLC support > > Patch even claims to have fixed this in v2, but is actually unchanged > from v1. > > Reported-by: Xiang, Haihao > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter Reviewed-by: Ben Widawsky -- Ben Widawsky, Intel Open Source Technology Center