From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Align the hangcheck wakeup to
 the nearest second
Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2012 18:46:07 +0200
Message-ID: <20121008164607.GC6116@phenom.ffwll.local>
References: <1349445188-16253-1-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
	<1349452977-5878-1-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
	<878vbhns9d.fsf@intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org>
Received: from mail-we0-f177.google.com (mail-we0-f177.google.com
	[74.125.82.177])
	by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B11A5A0282
	for <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>;
	Mon,  8 Oct 2012 09:45:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-we0-f177.google.com with SMTP id u50so2799822wey.36
	for <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>;
	Mon, 08 Oct 2012 09:45:09 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <878vbhns9d.fsf@intel.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/options/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx>
List-Post: <mailto:intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
List-Help: <mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org

On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 01:59:58PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Fri, 05 Oct 2012, Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote:
> > round_jiffies() aligns the wakeup time to the nearest second in order to
> > batch wakeups and reduce system load, which is useful for unimportant
> > coarse timers like our hangcheck.
> >
> > v2: round_jiffies_relative() returns the relative jiffie value, whereas
> > we need the absolute value for the timer.
> 
> On the series,
> 
> Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>

Both patches merged to dinq, thanks.
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch