From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Paulo Zanoni <przanoni@gmail.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/10] drm/i915: fix intel_init_power_wells
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 16:13:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130122141336.GH9135@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1358540953-3979-4-git-send-email-przanoni@gmail.com>
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 06:29:05PM -0200, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> From: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
>
> The current code was wrong in many different ways, so this is a full
> rewrite. We don't have "different power wells for different parts of
> the GPU", we have a single power well, but we have multiple registers
> that can be used to request enabling/disabling the power well. So
> let's be a good citizen and only use the register we're supposed to
> use, except when we're loading the driver, where we clear the request
> made by the BIOS.
>
> If any of the registers is requesting the power well to be enabled, it
> will be enabled. If none of the registers is requesting the power well
> to be enabled, it will be disabled.
>
> For now we're just forcing the power well to be enabled, but in the
> next commits we'll change this.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 8 ++--
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 5 +--
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h | 2 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 70 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> 4 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> index 2521617..f054554 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> @@ -4414,10 +4414,10 @@
> #define AUDIO_CP_READY_C (1<<9)
>
> /* HSW Power Wells */
> -#define HSW_PWR_WELL_CTL1 0x45400 /* BIOS */
> -#define HSW_PWR_WELL_CTL2 0x45404 /* Driver */
> -#define HSW_PWR_WELL_CTL3 0x45408 /* KVMR */
> -#define HSW_PWR_WELL_CTL4 0x4540C /* Debug */
> +#define HSW_PWR_WELL_BIOS 0x45400 /* CTL1 */
> +#define HSW_PWR_WELL_DRIVER 0x45404 /* CTL2 */
> +#define HSW_PWR_WELL_KVMR 0x45408 /* CTL3 */
> +#define HSW_PWR_WELL_DEBUG 0x4540C /* CTL4 */
> #define HSW_PWR_WELL_ENABLE (1<<31)
> #define HSW_PWR_WELL_STATE (1<<30)
> #define HSW_PWR_WELL_CTL5 0x45410
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> index b35902e..4a9f048 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> @@ -8647,10 +8647,7 @@ static void i915_disable_vga(struct drm_device *dev)
>
> void intel_modeset_init_hw(struct drm_device *dev)
> {
> - /* We attempt to init the necessary power wells early in the initialization
> - * time, so the subsystems that expect power to be enabled can work.
> - */
> - intel_init_power_wells(dev);
> + intel_init_power_well(dev);
>
> intel_prepare_ddi(dev);
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> index aeff0d1..8cfad75 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
> @@ -666,7 +666,7 @@ extern void intel_update_fbc(struct drm_device *dev);
> extern void intel_gpu_ips_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
> extern void intel_gpu_ips_teardown(void);
>
> -extern void intel_init_power_wells(struct drm_device *dev);
> +extern void intel_init_power_well(struct drm_device *dev);
> extern void intel_enable_gt_powersave(struct drm_device *dev);
> extern void intel_disable_gt_powersave(struct drm_device *dev);
> extern void gen6_gt_check_fifodbg(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> index 5a8a72c..2273b9c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> @@ -4043,33 +4043,69 @@ void intel_init_clock_gating(struct drm_device *dev)
> dev_priv->display.init_clock_gating(dev);
> }
>
> -/* Starting with Haswell, we have different power wells for
> - * different parts of the GPU. This attempts to enable them all.
> +static void intel_set_power_well(struct drm_device *dev, bool enable)
> +{
> + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
> + bool is_enabled, enable_requested;
> + uint32_t tmp;
> +
> + tmp = I915_READ(HSW_PWR_WELL_DRIVER);
> + is_enabled = !!(tmp & HSW_PWR_WELL_STATE);
> + enable_requested = !!(tmp & HSW_PWR_WELL_ENABLE);
> +
> + if (enable) {
> + if (!enable_requested)
> + I915_WRITE(HSW_PWR_WELL_DRIVER, HSW_PWR_WELL_ENABLE);
> +
> + if (!is_enabled) {
> + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Enabling power well\n");
> + if (wait_for((I915_READ(HSW_PWR_WELL_DRIVER) &
> + HSW_PWR_WELL_STATE), 20))
> + DRM_ERROR("Timeout enabling power well\n");
> + }
> + } else {
> + if (enable_requested)
> + I915_WRITE(HSW_PWR_WELL_DRIVER, 0);
> +
> + if (is_enabled) {
> + if (I915_READ(HSW_PWR_WELL_BIOS) & HSW_PWR_WELL_ENABLE)
> + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Not disabling power well: requested by BIOS\n");
> + else if (I915_READ(HSW_PWR_WELL_KVMR) & HSW_PWR_WELL_ENABLE)
> + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Not disabling power well: requested by KVMR\n");
> + else if (I915_READ(HSW_PWR_WELL_DEBUG) & HSW_PWR_WELL_ENABLE)
> + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Not disabling power well: requested by DEBUG\n");
> + else {
> + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Disabling power well\n");
> + if (wait_for((I915_READ(HSW_PWR_WELL_DRIVER) &
> + HSW_PWR_WELL_STATE) == 0, 20))
> + DRM_ERROR("Timeout disabling power well\n");
> + }
After some irc discussions Daniel came to the conclusion that the
status bit is likely just a delayed version of the request bit. I
tend to agree, nothing else makes much sense. So we should just
always poll the status bit after changing the request bit, and
completely ignore the KVMR/BIOS/DEBUG registers.
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-22 14:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-18 20:29 [PATCH 00/10] Haswell unclaimed register fixes and power well enabling Paulo Zanoni
2013-01-18 20:29 ` [PATCH 01/10] drm/i915: don't save/restore DSPARB on gen5+ Paulo Zanoni
2013-01-24 9:26 ` Jani Nikula
2013-01-24 15:58 ` Daniel Vetter
2013-01-18 20:29 ` [PATCH 02/10] drm/i915: don't read DP_TP_STATUS(PORT_A) Paulo Zanoni
2013-01-24 9:29 ` Jani Nikula
2013-01-18 20:29 ` [PATCH 03/10] drm/i915: fix intel_init_power_wells Paulo Zanoni
2013-01-21 13:37 ` Ville Syrjälä
2013-01-22 13:02 ` Daniel Vetter
2013-01-22 13:47 ` Ville Syrjälä
2013-01-22 14:13 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2013-01-24 11:39 ` Jani Nikula
2013-01-18 20:29 ` [PATCH 04/10] drm/i915: dynamic Haswell display power well support Paulo Zanoni
2013-01-24 13:15 ` Jani Nikula
2013-01-18 20:29 ` [PATCH 05/10] drm/i915: only disable enabled planes on intel_fb_restore_mode Paulo Zanoni
2013-01-18 20:29 ` [PATCH 06/10] drm/i915: check the power down well on assert_pipe() Paulo Zanoni
2013-01-21 13:45 ` Ville Syrjälä
2013-01-22 13:04 ` Daniel Vetter
2013-01-22 13:49 ` Ville Syrjälä
2013-01-25 15:40 ` Paulo Zanoni
2013-01-25 15:53 ` Ville Syrjälä
2013-01-25 16:04 ` Paulo Zanoni
2013-01-25 16:16 ` Ville Syrjälä
2013-01-18 20:29 ` [PATCH 07/10] drm/i915: turn on the power well before suspending Paulo Zanoni
2013-01-24 13:16 ` Jani Nikula
2013-01-18 20:29 ` [PATCH 08/10] drm/i915: set TRANSCODER_EDP even earlier Paulo Zanoni
2013-01-24 11:59 ` Jani Nikula
2013-01-18 20:29 ` [PATCH 09/10] drm/i915: print IVB/HSW display error interrupts Paulo Zanoni
2013-01-18 21:53 ` Ben Widawsky
2013-01-24 13:06 ` Jani Nikula
2013-01-24 13:04 ` Jani Nikula
2013-01-18 20:29 ` [PATCH 10/10] drm/i915: remove "unclaimed register" checks from I915_WRITE Paulo Zanoni
2013-01-18 20:49 ` Ben Widawsky
2013-01-18 20:56 ` Chris Wilson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130122141336.GH9135@intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com \
--cc=przanoni@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).