From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jesse Barnes Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/15] drm/i915: add HAS_POWER_WELL Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2013 09:14:56 -0800 Message-ID: <20130307091456.4c8f8a3f@jbarnes-desktop> References: <1362611003-4823-1-git-send-email-przanoni@gmail.com> <1362611003-4823-12-git-send-email-przanoni@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from oproxy12-pub.bluehost.com (oproxy12-pub.bluehost.com [50.87.16.10]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A0DFAE67E7 for ; Thu, 7 Mar 2013 09:14:45 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1362611003-4823-12-git-send-email-przanoni@gmail.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org To: Paulo Zanoni Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Paulo Zanoni List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org On Wed, 6 Mar 2013 20:03:18 -0300 Paulo Zanoni wrote: > From: Paulo Zanoni > > We're starting to add many IS_HASWELL checks for the power well code, > so add a HAS_POWER_WELL macro to properly document that we're checking > for hardware that has the power down well. > To be more future proof, we'll need to differentiate multiple power wells. Not sure we have good names for them though... -- Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center