From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/15] drm/i915: add HAS_POWER_WELL
Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2013 21:49:58 +0100
Message-ID: <20130317204958.GQ9021@phenom.ffwll.local>
References: <1362611003-4823-1-git-send-email-przanoni@gmail.com>
	<1362611003-4823-12-git-send-email-przanoni@gmail.com>
	<20130307091456.4c8f8a3f@jbarnes-desktop>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org>
Received: from mail-ea0-f182.google.com (mail-ea0-f182.google.com
	[209.85.215.182])
	by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C0A2E5C37
	for <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>;
	Sun, 17 Mar 2013 13:47:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ea0-f182.google.com with SMTP id q15so2312071ead.13
	for <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>;
	Sun, 17 Mar 2013 13:47:12 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20130307091456.4c8f8a3f@jbarnes-desktop>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/options/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx>
List-Post: <mailto:intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
List-Help: <mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
To: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org

On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 09:14:56AM -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Wed,  6 Mar 2013 20:03:18 -0300
> Paulo Zanoni <przanoni@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > From: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
> > 
> > We're starting to add many IS_HASWELL checks for the power well code,
> > so add a HAS_POWER_WELL macro to properly document that we're checking
> > for hardware that has the power down well.
> > 
> 
> To be more future proof, we'll need to differentiate multiple power
> wells.  Not sure we have good names for them though...

I think we'll just invent names once they show up ... Queued for -next,
thanks for the patch. I've had to drop the first hunk though since that
has been introduced by the previous patch, which I've rejected.
-Daniel
> 
> -- 
> Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch