From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Subject: Re: More fastboot bits
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 08:20:52 -0700
Message-ID: <20130320082052.4f9dbd0d@jbarnes-desktop>
References: <1361309508-4901-1-git-send-email-jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
	<1363781732.13528.9.camel@intelbox>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org>
Received: from oproxy5-pub.bluehost.com (oproxy5-pub.bluehost.com
	[67.222.38.55])
	by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C3C3BE5D59
	for <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>;
	Wed, 20 Mar 2013 08:20:53 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <1363781732.13528.9.camel@intelbox>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/options/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx>
List-Post: <mailto:intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
List-Help: <mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx>,
	<mailto:intel-gfx-request@lists.freedesktop.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org
To: imre.deak@intel.com
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org

On Wed, 20 Mar 2013 14:15:32 +0200
Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> wrote:

> On Tue, 2013-02-19 at 13:31 -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > This one adds some extra checks on top of Chris's last set:
> >   - check for panel fit modes when inheriting from the BIOS
> >   - update pfit state at pipe_set_base time
> 
> I missed this version of the patchset and reviewed the previous one :/
> Sending it with a v2 subject prefix with a proper In-reply-to header
> would've been nice, consider the high traffic on this list.
> 
> Some of the comments from that review are still valid, so I'll copy them
> over.

Great, thanks.  Sorry about the confusion, reposts like this are a bad
habit from a lower volume mailing list. :)  I'll endeavor to improve
myself.

> 
> > It also changes the mode set vs flip checking to include the non-fb case
> > (e.g. if the BIOS fb was too small for the native mode), since we might
> > still be able to flip in that case.
> > 
> > Finally, it includes a clock_get routine for ilk+.  I'd appreciate if
> > someone could test this out on a machine where VBIOS supports the native
> > panel mode, so the kernel can boot from the boot loader in the native
> > mode.  In that case, it should actually fastboot and avoid the whole
> > mode set/panel power sequence.
> 
> My ilk doesn't seem to start with a native mode, so can't test it there.
> Would it be possible to test this with reloading the module?

Yeah, that should also work, but I definitely haven't tested it as much.

-- 
Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center