From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Vetter Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] Revert "drm/i915: set TRANSCODER_EDP even earlier" Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 14:59:23 +0100 Message-ID: <20130322135923.GT9021@phenom.ffwll.local> References: <1363946021-26651-1-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> <1363946021-26651-2-git-send-email-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-ee0-f52.google.com (mail-ee0-f52.google.com [74.125.83.52]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E79C1E6361 for ; Fri, 22 Mar 2013 06:56:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ee0-f52.google.com with SMTP id b15so2231021eek.39 for ; Fri, 22 Mar 2013 06:56:36 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces+gcfxdi-intel-gfx=m.gmane.org@lists.freedesktop.org To: Paulo Zanoni Cc: Takashi Iwai , Daniel Vetter , Intel Graphics Development , Paulo Zanoni List-Id: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 09:30:05AM -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote: > 2013/3/22 Daniel Vetter : > > This reverts commit cc464b2a17c59adedbdc02cc54341d630354edc3. > > > > The reason is that Takashi Iwai reported a regression bisected to this > > commit: > > > > http://www.mail-archive.com/intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org/msg18788.html > > > > His machine has eDP on port D (usual desktop all-in-on setup), which > > intel_dp.c identifies as an eDP panel, but the hsw ddi code > > mishandles. > > > > But in retrospective I also don't like that this leaks highly platform > > specific details into common code, and the reason is that the drm > > vblank layer sucks. So instead I think we should: > > - move the cpu_transcoder into the dynamic pipe_config tracking (once > > that's merged). > > - fix up the drm vblank layer to finally deal with kms crtc objects > > instead of int pipes. > > Looks like we'll never get rid of all the unclaimed register errors... > > Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni Picked up for -fixes, thanks for the review. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch